The contempt case was filed for alleged willful disobedience of a High Court order directing payment of specific amounts. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the order had been complied with, and the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010271202026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2036 OF 2026
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
2
...Respondents
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of order dated 17.10.2025 passed W.P.No.25672 of 2025 on the file of this Honble Court and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: V.N.V.SURYA DATTU
Counsel for the Respondents: RAMA RAO KOCHIRI Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
The Court made the following
3
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.25672 of 2025 on 17.10.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order:
“….this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amounts to the petitioner in accordance with the quality control certificate i.e., dated 22.03.2025 to a tune of Rs.4,72,045/-, Rs.7,54,007/-, Rs.7,14,413/-, Rs.11,44,509/-, Rs.5,99,975/-, Rs.7,12,210/-, Rs.7,39,407/- and Rs.12,39,348/- respectively, issued by the respondents within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order......…”
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
__________________
Date: 11.09.2026 KGR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ancha Mallikarjuna Rao
Sri G Sai Prasad
Sri Peeyush Kumar
Sri P Venkata Rathnam
Smt P Prashanthi
Sri B Murali Krishna
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
