The High Court closed the contempt proceedings after the petitioners' counsel admitted that the court's orders had been complied with by the respondent. No costs were awarded.
Contempt case closed; liberty to file appropriate proceedings if aggrieved
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3330]
APHC010239342026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1902/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully disobeying the orders of this Honhle Court in W.P.No. 6444 of 2026, dated 07.03.2026, and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
2
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to Re-call the bailable warrant issued against the 1st respondent vide order dt. 13.07.2026 in C.C. No. 1902 of 2026 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Contemnor:
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1902 of 2026
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly admitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondent.
Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. However, if at all the petitioners are aggrieved, they are at liberty to file appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Date: 10.09.2026 KBN
4
51
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Contempt Case No.1902 of 2026
10.09.2026 KBN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contemnor had willfully disobeyed the orders of the High Court in W.P.No. 6444 of 2026 dated 07.03.2026
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Abdul Khaja
Shaik Jani Moulali
K Yakub Basha
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
