Meka Murali Krishna, v. Mukesh Kumar Meena, IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case by four bar licensees against A.P. Prohibition and Excise officials (Principal Secretary; Commissioner and Director; District Prohibition and Excise Officer, Rajamahendravaram) for alleged disobedience of High Court orders dated 10.03.2026 in I.A.No.1 of 2026 in WP.No.6657 of 2026; compliance reported and undisputed; Contempt Case No.1889 of 2026 closed, no order as to costs, pending interlocutory applications closed; Contempt of Courts Act 1971, Sections 10 to 12; Justice Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao.
What did the court decide?
On the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents (undisputed by the petitioners' counsel) that the Court's orders had been complied with, the Court closed the present Contempt Case and directed that there shall be no order as to costs. ¶32