Disposed¶29

L. Rama, v. Smt. Y. v Anuradha, I.A.S.

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Sections 10 to 12

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Mar 2026CC/1757/2018

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Contempt Case No. 1757 of 2018, decided 10.03.2026 — contempt petition by L. Rama, Deputy Executive Engineer, Office of the Executive Officer, Sri Tirupatamma Ammavari Devasthanam, Penuganchiprolu, Krishna District, against Smt Y V Anuradha, IAS, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, for non-compliance with the order dated 06.04.2016 in W.P.M.P.No.14193 of 2016 in W.P.No.11243 of 2016 (Justice A. V. Sesha Sai); case closed after counsel recorded that the petitioner had been promoted and the interim order complied with; no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

None; contempt case closed on recording compliance (petitioner promoted), with no order as to costs and all pending applications closed. ¶29

L. Rama, Vs Smt. Y. v. Anuradha, I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

APHC010512452018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3504]

¶6

TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶9

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1757/2018

¶10

Between:

¶11

L. RAMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NOW PRESENTLY WORKING AS DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI TIRUPATAMMA AMMAVARI DEVASTHANAM, PENUGANCHIPROLU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, R/O. D. NO. 37-1-34/A, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

SMT Y V ANURADHA I A S, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada. (other respondents in W.P.M.P. and W.P are not necessary parties in the present C.C.)

¶15

...CONTEMNOR

¶16

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act for willful violation and disobeying the orders dated 06.04.2016 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 14193 of 2016 in W.P.No.11243 of 2016 by His Lordship Hon'ble Sri Justice A. V. Sesha Sai and pass

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶18

1.T S RAYALU

¶19

¶20

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶21

1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)

¶22

The Court made the following:

¶23

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶25

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1757 of 2018

¶26

ORDER:-

¶27

The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the order dated 06.04.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No.14193 of 2016 in W.P.No.11243 of 2016.

¶28

When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri T.S. Rayalu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner had been promoted and, therefore, the interim order dated 06.04.2016 had been complied with.

¶29