The High Court closed the contempt petition after petitioner's counsel confirmed that the underlying court order had been complied with, leaving nothing for adjudication.
Contempt Case closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010217712026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to leased to punish the respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their willful, deliberate and intentional violation of the orders of this Hon'ble Court, dated 22.12.2025 in W.P.No.35539 of 2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.35539 of 2025, dated 22.12.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date: 11.09.2026 LSP
37
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1739/2026
Date: 11.09.2026 LSP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SREE BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER YELLIPALEM MADHU SUDHAN REDDY
PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SHREEDHARCHARUKURI IAS DISTRICT COLLECTOR KURNOOL
K RAKESH CHANDRAM KADAPA MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
Harinath N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
