Petitioner sought to punish respondents for alleged violation of a High Court order. Counsel submitted that the challenged order was complied with. The Court accepted the submission and closed the contempt case without passing any other order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading :
APHC010219902026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1737/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
2
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon, prosecute and punish the Respondents u/s 10 to 12 of contempt of Courts Act for willful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Honble High Court passed in WP.No.25361 of 2023, dt.2008-2025 and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A RAJENDRA BABU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.NAGARAJU NAGURU
The Court made the following:
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
C.C.No.1737 of 2026
O R DE R:
Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the order dated 20.08.2025 in W.P.No.25361 of 2023 was complied with and filed Rc.No.A2/1222/2018, dated 09.09.2026 to that effect.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
in this Petition shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 10.09.2026
KLP
Battula Ratna Babu
Peeyush Kumar IAS
Padamaja Kare
M Chandra Sekhara Reddy
A Syam Babu
Nypathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
