Disposed

S v. v Rambabu, v Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Sept 2026CC/1670/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The contempt petition filed under Sections 10-12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for alleged willful violation of a writ petition order dated 08.09.2025 was closed after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's orders had been complied with. No costs were awarded and any related miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.

S v v Rambabu, Vs Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

APHC010203662026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3333]

¶6

FRIDAY, THE 11^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶9

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1670/2026

¶10

Between:

¶11

S V V RAMBABU,, S/O VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, DOOR NO 27-3-107, NEHRUPETA, NEAR RAYALAM BRIDGE, BHIMAVARAM,WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

SRI G SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.

¶15

SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.

¶16

SMT C NAGARANI I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM.

¶17

SRI CH DEVA PRAKASH, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU.

¶18

SRI CH V V S SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM.

¶19

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶20

¶21

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 6841 /2024 dated 08.09.2025 by Learned Single Judge

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶23

1.ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA

¶24

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶25

1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

¶26

2.SOMA RAJU YELISETTI

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

¶29

ORDER :

¶30

Sri. Annamneedi Balakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner

¶31

submitted that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case.

¶32

Recording the same, this contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶35

Date: 11.09.2026

¶36

Gss

S v. v Rambabu, v Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S v. v Rambabu, v Sri. G Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases