The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the respondents had complied with the earlier order, and the court closed the contempt case with no order as to costs.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
[3333]
APHC010201732026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1646/2026
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may
2
be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for the willful and deliberate disobedience of the Order passed by this Hon'ble Court dt 07-112025 in WP 29020 / 2025 in the interest of justice and to pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order dated 07.08.2026 passed in C.C.No.1646 of 2026 in W.P.No.29020 of 2025 and pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the Respondent No.1 on 11.09.2026 in C.C.No.1646 of 2026 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER :
Ms. M.S.V.S. Sudha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted
that the orders passed by this Court have been complied and requested this Court to close the contempt case.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 11.09.2026
Gss
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents complied with the High Court's order dated 07.11.2025 in WP 29020/2025 such that the contempt petition should be closed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Arava Naga Venkata Rama Rao
Sri Narasimha Murthy
Ms Keerthi Chekuri
Sri G Srinivas
Sri V V Rama Krishna
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
