Disposed¶30

Appalasetty Tatababu, v. Sri. Ch. Dwaraka Tirumala Rao - IPS

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Jul 2026CC/1605/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court contempt case by Appalasetty Tata Babu (APSRTC conductor, Parvathipuram Depot) against Ch.Dwaraka Tirumala Rao IPS (Vice Chairman & Managing Director, APSRTC), Tatanala Venkateswara Rao (District Public Transport Officer) and Eleti Satyakanaka Durga (Depot Manager) for alleged violation of orders dated 29.10.2024 in W.A.No.884 of 2024; representation rejected by proceedings dated 30.11.2024; contempt case closed with liberty to challenge the rejection proceedings; no costs; pending applications closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed as nothing survives for adjudication; petitioner granted liberty to avail remedies in law against the proceedings dated 30.11.2024; no costs; all pending applications stand closed. ¶30

Appalasetty Tatababu, Vs Sri. Ch. Dwaraka Tirumala Rao - IPS — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 0 6.07.2026 Date of uploading :

¶3

APHC010326362025

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3543]

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

MOND A Y, THE 6^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶10

CONTEMPT CASE No: 1605 of 2025

¶11

Between:

¶12

APPALASETTY TAT A BABU, S/o.LATE GOPALAM, AGED A BOUT 58 YEARS, OCC- CON D UCTOR, O/o. THE PARVATHIPURA M DEPOT, A.P.S.R.TC., R/o.H. N o.#3-103, PARVATHIPURAM VILL A GE AND MANDAL, MANYAM D ISTRICT.

¶13

...PETITIONER

¶14

AND

¶15

SRI CH.DWARAKA T IRUMALA RAO IPS, VICE CHAIR M AN AND MANAGING DIREC T OR OF ANDHRA PRADESH, STA T E ROAD TRANSPORT CORP O RATION (A.P.S.R.TC.), PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAW A DA, N.T.R. DISTRICT.

¶16

SRI TATANALA V ENKATESWARA RAO, DISTRICT PUBLIC TRANSPORT OFFI C ER, APSRTC, PARVATHIPURAM DEPOT, VIZIANAGARAM DIS T RICT.

¶17

SMT.ELETI SATY A KANAKA DURGA, DEPOT M ANAGER, A.P.S.R.TC. PARVA T HIPURAM DEPOT, VIZIANAGARAM D ISTRICT.

¶18

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶19

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.Mr.PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶23

1.Mr.K SRINIVASA PRASAD, SC For APSRTC

¶24

¶25

The Court made the following order:

¶26

The present Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 29.10.2024 passed in W.A.No.884 of 2024 wherein one of us (TCD,J) is a Member.

¶27

Learned Division Bench vide said order, directed the RespondentEmployer to consider the Writ Petition as representation and consider and dispose it, strictly in accordance with Law, within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

¶28

At the time of considering the matter, it is stated that the grievance of the petitioner ventilated in writ petition which is directed to be treated as representation was considered and rejected vide proceedings dated 30.11.2024. A copy of the said proceedings is filed along with the material papers annexed to the counter-affidavit of respondent No.3.

¶29

In the aforesaid stated position, nothing survives for adjudication in the Contempt Case. Accordingly, the same is closed. However, the petitioner may avail the remedies available in Law against the proceedings dated 30.11.2024, if he is so advised. No costs.

¶30

No order as to costs. Consequently, all pending applications shall stand closed.

¶31

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

¶32

_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶33

Date: 06.07.2026 BLV

¶34

¶35

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

¶36