Kmr Law College Vs Sri Bhupathi Naidu Madhala

SRI BHUPATHI NAIDU MADHALA, Registrar, Sri Venkateswara University, Prakasam Road, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh - 517502.

¶14

...CONTEMNOR

¶15

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent/alieged contemnor for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 20-02-2026 passed in W.P. No.32408 of 2025 and punish

¶16

2

¶17

them in accordance with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and pass

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶19

1.SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI

¶20

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶21

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1355/2026

¶22

Between:

¶23

RAYALASEEMA LAW COLLEGE, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI. YARRAPU REDDY ANAND CHINTHAGUNTA VILLAGE, SANAMBATIA, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶24

...PETITIONER

¶25

AND

¶26

SRI BHUPATHI NAIDU MADHALA, Registrar, Sri Venkateswara University, Prakasam Road, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh - 517502.

¶27

...CONTEMNOR

¶28

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent/alleged contemnor for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 13-02-2026 passed in W.P. No.32418 of 2025 and punish them in accordance with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and pass

¶29

3

¶30

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶31

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of order in W.P. No. 32418 of 2025, dated 13-02-2026 and to pass

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶33

1.SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI

¶34

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶35

¶36

The Court made the following:

¶37

Whether the order is :

¶38

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

¶39

4

¶40

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶41

C.C.Nos.1322 & 1355 of 2026

¶42

COMMON ORDER:

¶43

These contempt cases are filed for non-compliance of the orders dated 20.02.2026 in W.P.No.32408 and order dated 13.02.2026 in W.P.No.32418 of 2025.

¶44

Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the orders in W.P.Nos.32408 and 32418 of 2025 were challenged in W.A.Nos.393 and 392 of 2026 respectively and this Court disposed of the Writ Appeals by order dated 27.04.2026 with certain modifications and seeks for closure of the contempt cases.

¶45

Noting the said submission and as the orders of this Court are modified by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeals, the contempt cases are closed.

¶46

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand

¶47

dismissed.

¶48

___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J

¶49

Date: 14.07.2026 KLP

Kmr Law College v. Sri Bhupathi Naidu Madhala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kmr Law College v. Sri Bhupathi Naidu Madhala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Zilani Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

C. Rama Krishnappa Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri P.V. Naga Sai, Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Devarapalli Ramakrishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

G. Mekalaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr. T. Surya Manga Devi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh