Disposed¶23

K Narmada v. Prasanthi

Andhra Pradesh HC31 Mar 2026CC/1101/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010420012019; Contempt Case No. 1101/2019; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; decided 01.04.2026 by Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad. Petitioner K Narmada (M/s. Kamadhenu Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd.) vs contemnor Prasanthi, Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Ananthapur. Contempt Case closed (no costs) as infructuous because main Writ Petitions W.P.Nos.15601 of 2019 and batch were disposed of on 23.11.2020; related Interim Order dated 22.10.2019; counsel R Annapurna for petitioner, Kalava Suresh Kumar Reddy (SC, MC Rayal Region, Nellore) for contemnor.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the Contempt Case is closed with no order as to costs, and interlocutory applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ¶23

K Narmada Vs Prasanthi — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010420012019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1101/2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

K NARMADA, W/O. K. LINGA REDDY, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S. KAMADHENU OUTSOURCING PVT. LTD., D.NO.12/4/61, PLOT NO. 64, MAIN ROAD, VIDYUTH NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

PRASANTHI, THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.

¶14

...CONTEMNOR

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶16

1.R ANNAPURNA

¶17

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶18

1.KALAVA SURESH KUMAR REDDY ( SC FOR MC RAYAL REGION, NELLORE)

¶19

The Court made the following:

¶20

ORAL ORDER:

¶21

It transpires from record that the Writ Petition bearing W.P.Nos.15601 of 2019 and batch was dismissed as infructuous by the learned Single Judge of this Court vide Order dated 23.11.2020.

¶22

Since the main Writ Petition itself has been disposed of on 23.11.2020, this Contempt Case filed complaining of the violation of the Interim Order dated 22.10.2019 in W.P.Nos.15601 of 2019 and batch does not survive. The Order dated 23.11.2020 is taken on record.

¶23