Dismissed¶37

P Ramanamma v. M. Padmavathi

Andhra Pradesh HC20 Jul 2026AS/60/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural order only: permission to withdraw appeal suit; Appeal Suit No. 60/2018 dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Section 151 CPC miscellaneous petitions (IA Nos.2 and 4 of 2017, ASMP 18074 and 18076 of 2017) closed; relates to decree in O.S.No.48 of 2003, XIII Additional District Judge (FTC), Vijayawada; eighth respondent added vide IA.287/2006 dt.30.03.2007; contains no holdings on substantive law and cites no precedents.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Appeal Suit; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. ¶37

P Ramanamma Vs M. Padmavathi — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

APHC011016422017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3603] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE 21^st DAY OF JULY 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

¶7

APPEAL SUIT NO: 60/2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

P RAMANAMMA, PACHAVA RAMANAMMA, W/O. VENGAIAH, HINDU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O DOLPHIN BAR ROAD, D.NO.76-12-1/2, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶10

...APPELLANT

¶11

AND

¶12

M PADMAVATHI, W/O. MALA KONDAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RIO DOOR. NO. 76-8-18/2, SWATHI ROAD, IIIRD LANE, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶13

MYNAMPATI PEDA VENKATAIAH, (DIED ON 27.08.2004) S/O. LATE PEDA BASAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RIO GUVVADI VILLAGE, VARIKUNTAPADU MANDAL, DISTRICT NELLORE.

¶14

MYNAMPATI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O. MYNAMPATI PEDA VENKATAIA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RIO GUVVADI VILLAGE, VARIKUNTAPADU MANDAL, DISTRICT NELLORE.

¶15

MYNAMPATI RAMANAIAH, S/O. MYNAMPATI PEDA VENKATAIALI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RIO BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, D. NO. 76-5-13, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶16

MYNAMPATI VENKAT RAO, S/O. MYNAMPATI PEDA VENKATAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC

¶17

¶18

BUSINESS, R/O BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶19

MYNAMPATI VENKATESWARULU, S/O PEDA VENKATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RIO BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, D. NO. 76-5-16, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶20

MYNAMPATI SRINIVASULU, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RIO D. NO. 76-14-232, SAI BABA STREET, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA 12.

¶21

NADENDLA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED 57 YEARS, RIO PLOT NO. 59, RTC COLONY, PATAMATA IN VIJAYAWADA. (ADDED AS PER ORDERS IN IA. 287/2006 DT30.03.2007) (R2 R8 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES)

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

to admit the First Appeal and set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.NO 48 of 2003, Dated 09th day of August, 2017 on the file of the Court of XIII Additional District Judge (FTC), at Vijayawada, and pass

¶24

IA NO: 2 OF 2017(ASMP 18074 OF 2017

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment and Decree passed in OS No. 48 of 2003,dated 06th day of August 2017 on the file of the Court of XIII Addl. District Judg (FTC), at Vijayawada, and pass

¶26

IA NO: 4 OF 2017(ASMP 18076 OF 2017

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶28

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶29

1.T V P SAI VIHARI

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶31

1.P PRABHAKAR RAO

¶32

The Court made the following:

¶33

¶34

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 60/2018

¶35

ORDER: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh )

¶36

In view of the letter dated 15.07.2026 submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) before the Registry, requesting to post the matter under the caption for withdrawal, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal suit, permission is accorded.

¶37

Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶38

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

¶40

JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR

¶41

Date: 21.07.2026 klk

¶42

¶43