P.Ranga Rao v. K. Purushotham Chowdary
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; appellants absent; lis 'for dismissal' caption; A.S. No. 4106/2004 vs O.S. No. 8 of 1998 (I Addl. District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, decree dt. 12-12-2003); Section 151 CPC stay petitions; LIC of India impleaded as R-6 (ASMP 1712/2008, C.O. dt. 31-10-08); E.P. No. 22/2006 in O.S. No. 17/2000 (Principal District Judge, Krishna at Machlipatnam); Sub Registrar Mudinepalli registration bar sought for Ac.4.56 cents in Sy.No.204/2 Peyyeru Village; interim orders and miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs; registry id APHC010430952004. Utility: evidentiary value nil on merits — usable only to show the first appeal ended in dismissal for non-prosecution and consequential closure of ancillary applications; underlying 2003 decree stands undisturbed by this order.
What did the court decide?
The matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal' and none appeared for the appellant(s); as the appellants appeared not inclined to prosecute the matter, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.