Dismissed¶33

Karra Hema Maheswara Rao v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Nov 2025WP/8246/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; W.P.No.8246 of 2023; Karra Hema Maheswara Rao v. State of AP and others; pensionary benefits; full pension; commutation; gratuity; retired Joint Director of Agriculture; writ of mandamus; Article 226; Articles 14 and 21; Section 151 CPC; IA No.1 of 2023; representations 2021-2022; letter dated 23-08-2018; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Nyapathy Vijay, J; decided 06.11.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the permission of the Court. No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. ¶33

Karra Hema Maheswara Rao Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010159082023

¶2

[3460]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8246/2023

¶8

Between:

¶9

KARRA HEMA MAHESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO AGED 65 YEARS, OCC RETIRED JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, R/O F.NO.60, D.NO.74-5-3/11, NEW RTC COLONY, OPP STATUS RESIDENCY, PEDDIREDDYVARI STREET, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND CO-OPERATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI

¶13

THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER/DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, , CHUTTUGUNTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, , GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BANDAR ROAD, VIJAYAWADA.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents, particularly the respondent No.2 in not paying the pensionary benefits i.e., full pension, commutation and gratituty to the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of

¶17

¶18

Section Art.14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the pensionary benefits to the Petitioner in terms of Lr.No. Ag.(AE)AP/P2/IV/H-82/SP407/2018-07/2180, dated 23-08-2018, issued by the 3rd respondent by duly considering the representations of the petitioner 0104-2021, 12-07-2021, 02-08-2021, 18-04-2022, 23-08-2022 and 05-12-2022 and pass

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation date 05-12-2022 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22