M/s. Madiga Hakkula Parirakshana Seva Samithi, Vs Union of India

M/S. MADIGA HAKKULA PARIRAKSHANA SEVA SAMITHI,, REGD. NO. (19/2014), H. NO.59A-21/3-2/7B, FLAT NO.501, SRI NANDI TOWERS, VIJAYANAGAR COLONY, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY, SRI RAYAVARAPU CHIRANJEEVA RAO S/O. ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED GOVT. EMPLOYEE, RIO. 32-1919, GUMMADI THOTA STREET, MOGHALRAJAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶11

M/S. MADIGA RESERVATION SADANA SAMITHI (MRSS), REGD. NO.185/2015, H.NO. 54-16-15/13, FLT NO.501, SRI NILAYA APARTMENTS, OPP: LAYOLA AUDITORIUM, VIJAYAWADA, VIJAYAWADA TOWN, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. STATE, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT SRI VALLURU VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: GOVT. EMPLOYEE & TREASURER, M/S. MADIGA RESERVATION SADANA SAMITHI, REGD. NO. (185/2015), R/O.54-

¶12

...PETITIONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

UNION OF INDIA, SOCIAL JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT DEPARTMENT, SHANTHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI - 1, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,

¶15

STATE OF TELANGANA, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,

¶16

2

¶17

JS, J W.P.No.5994 of 2017

¶18

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not complying with Section 3(4) of the Commission of Enquiry Act, 1952, on the report dated 01.05.2008 submitted by the National Commission, as arbitrary, illegal and violates the Principles of Natural Justice and Article 14, 15, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the Respondents to comply with Section 3(4) of the Commission of Enquiry Act, 1952 on the report dated 01.05.2008 submitted by the National Commission and the report dated 26.05.1999 submitted by Mr. Justice Ramachandra Raju; Commissioner of Enquiry for Sub-categorization of Scheduled Castes and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 7346 OF 2017

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take appropriate action on the representation dated 13.11.2014 submitted by the 1st Writ Petitioner Samithi, by taking appropriate action on the report dated 01.05.2008 submitted by the National Commission, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass

¶23

IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP 11672 OF 2017

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner Organisation Scheduled Castes Ikya Vedika , Telengana State & Andhra Pradesh to implead the prayer as follows : to implead as Party Respondent No 4 in the Writ Petition No 5994 / 2017

¶25

IA NO: 3 OF 2017(WPMP 13533 OF 2017

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Implead the Petitioner's Sangam as Proposed Respondent No. 4 as Respondent No. 4 in W.Po.Noo5994 of 2017, for proper adjudication of the case as this Hon'ble Court may be deem fit and proper and pass

¶27

3

¶28

JS, J W.P.No.5994 of 2017

¶29

IA NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP 14125 OF 2017

¶30

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass appropriate o orders to implead the proposed Respondent No. 4 as Respondent in W.P.No.5994 of 2017,and to pass

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶32

1.S ASHOK ANAND KUMAR

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶34

1.J SATYA PRASAD

¶35

2.M RAJKUMAR

¶36

3.DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

¶37

4.GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP)

¶38

5.GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (TG)

¶39

6.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG)

¶40

7.P RATNAM

¶41

4

¶42

JS, J W.P.No.5994 of 2017

¶43

The Court made the following Order:

¶44

Sri S. Sai Krishna, learned counsel represented before this Court that

¶45

he has instructions to file vakalat on behalf of the petitioners and requested time. The matter was listed on 01.12.2025 and on 08.12.2025, there was no representation on the said dates.

¶46

Even today, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. It therefore appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.

¶47