Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of representation for the petitioner; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications, if any, closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010247432004
Bench Sr.No:-43 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3506] AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5418 of 2004
K.V. Raghava Rao, Ongole Vs.
...Petitioner
The Govt. of A. P. and Others ...Respondent(s)
Advocate for Petitioner: Sri P V S S S RAMA RAO Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Sri DADI RADHA KRISHNA, GP FOR COOPERATION
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
DATE : 19th December 2025
ORDER:
On 05.12.2025, as there was no representation for the petitioner,
the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. It indicates
that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if
any, in this case shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Date:19.12.2025.
cs
K.V. Raghava Rao, Ongole
The Govt. of A.P.
Challa Gunaranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
