Dismissed¶36

Sangati Nageswara Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Jul 2025WP/5411/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; Writ Petition No. 5411 of 2025; decided 22-07-2025; Justice Kiranmayee Mandava; Sangati Nageswara Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others; Annapurna Canteen; RIMS / Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Kadapa; canteen eviction; interference with business; writ of mandamus; Articles 14, 19, 21; Article 226; Section 151 CPC; I.A. No.1 of 2025; dismissed as infructuous; no costs; counsel P V N Kiran Kumar / Sanaga Ashok Kumar; GP for Medical Health & Family Welfare.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted on merits; writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission, with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ¶36

Sangati Nageswara Reddy Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010105072025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WM 0^ (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 5411 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sangati Nageswara Reddy, S/o.S.Nagireddy, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Proprietor of Annapurna Canteen, 1st Floor, RIMS OP, RIMS, Kadapa, Y.S.R.District, R/o.Door No.39/631-3-2, Aravinda Nagar, Kadapa, YSR District. ...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District.

¶11

The Deputy Director, Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Kadapa, YSR District.

¶12

The Superintendent, Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Kadapa, YSR District.

¶13

The RMO, Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Kadapa, YSR District.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly

¶16

one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the highhanded action on the part of the respondents No.2 to 4 in interfering with^{mybusinessactivitiesof} Annapurna Canteen located at 1st Floor, RIMS Hospital, at RIMS OP, Kadapa, Y.S.R.District and trying to evict me from^{thepremiseswithout} issuance of any notice and without calling for auction of lease^holdrightsof the said canteen by yielding to the pressure of the^ruling political party persons as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the settled^legal position, apart from being violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to^us under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no.2 to 4 not to evict me from the Annapurna Canteen, 1st Floor, Rajeev Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS OP, Kadapa, YSR District and allow me to run the business. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that^{inthecircumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no.2 to 4 not to^interfere in the business activities of the Annapurna Canteen located at Rajeev^Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, RIMS OP, First Floor, Kadapa, YSR District without following due process of law, pending disposal of the^{aboveWritPetition.}

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P V N KIRAN KUMAR

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MED HEALTH AND^FAMILY WELFARE

¶19

The Court made the following order:

¶20

APHC010105072025

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶22

[3458]

¶23

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶24

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶25

PRESENT

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

¶27

WRIT PETITION NO: 5411 OF 2025

¶28

Between;

¶29

Sangati Nageswara Reddy ...PETITIONER

¶30

AND

¶31

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner: P V N Kiran Kumar

¶33

Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Medical Health & Family Welfare

¶34

The Court made the following order:

¶35

Sri Sanaga Ashok Kumar, learned counsel representing^{SriP.V.N.Kiran} Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition has becomes infructuous.

¶36

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶37

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand

¶38

closed.

¶39

Sd /- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri P V N Kiran Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

¶44

Two CCs to GP for Med Health and Family Welfare,^High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]

¶45

Two CD Copies TF

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/07/2025

ORDER

WP NO. 5411 OF 2025

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS

Sangati Nageswara Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangati Nageswara Reddy v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balayogini Sri Sri Sri Manikyeswari Matha Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Guntur District Cricket Association Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

U Seetaramalakshmi Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Mathangi Suresh Babu Vs Gazzala Srinivasa Reddy

Mathangi Suresh Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

C. Ganganna, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh