Dismissed¶29

Dr. K.Lakshmi Janakamma, v. Sri Venkateswara University

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Mar 2025WP/5150/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; W.P.No.5150 of 2018; Dr. K. Lakshmi Janakamma vs Sri Venkateswara University and Others; writ petition under Article 226; writ of mandamus; age of superannuation 62 years; University Rules and Regulations; non-payment of salary from July 2017; arrears of salary; cause no longer survives; dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; pending applications closed; Dr Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; decided 07.03.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs and pending applications closed. ¶29

Dr. K.Lakshmi Janakamma, Vs Sri Venkateswara… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

APHC010116352018

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3396]

¶6

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5150/2018

¶9

Between:

¶10

Dr. K.Lakshmi Janakamma,

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

Sri Venkateswara University and Others

¶14

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶16

1.GUDURI VENKATESWARA RAO

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶18

1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP)

¶19

2.BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKAR ( SC FOR SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY

¶20

The Court made the following:

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5150/2018

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with

¶25

the following prayer for:

¶26

“…to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the petitioner is entitled to continue till the age of superannuation of 62 years as per the Rules and Regulations of the University; the non-payment of salary of the petitioner from July 2017 onwards by continuously availing her services as highly arbitrary, unjustified and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to pay the arrears of salary and other amounts due to the petitioner till date immediately and to pass…”

¶27

Heard Sri G. Venkateshwara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women Development for the respondents is in attendance.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause no longer survives in this matter and the petition may be disposed of.

¶29

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since, the

¶30

relief has become infructuous. No order as to Costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶31

____________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J

¶32

Date:07.03.2025 UPS

¶33

¶34

¶35

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶36

W.P.No.5150 of 2018 Dated.07.03.2025

¶37

UPS

Dr. K.Lakshmi Janakamma, v. Sri Venkateswara University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. K.Lakshmi Janakamma, v. Sri Venkateswara University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V Venkatesh Vs the State of Ap

J.Vasanth Rao Vs The a.P.S.P.D.C.Limited

S.Krishna Bhaskara Rao Vs the State of Ap

Ruthala Ramana Alias Ramana Master Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr v Chandra Kumar Vs the State of Ap

R S Kumari Vs the State of Ap