Disposed¶28

Bestha Lavanya v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Nov 2025WP/4985/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bare disposal order: writ petition disposed of (not allowed/dismissed on merits) on counsel's confirmation that petitioner Bestha Lavanya (contractor, Kurnool) had received the entire amount owed by State of Andhra Pradesh / APTDC respondents; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed. Bench: Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad; decided 04.11.2025; WRIT PETITION NO: 4985/2023; registry ref APHC010098622023. No statutory provisions, precedents, impugned order, or quantum figures appear in the text.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief adjudicated; the Writ Petition was disposed of after counsel confirmed on instructions that the petitioner had received the entire amount; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, closed. ¶28

Bestha Lavanya Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010098622023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 4985/2023

¶9

Between:

¶10

BESTHA LAVANYA, W / O NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 81/331, BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, YOUTH ADVANCEMENT, TOURISM AND CULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

¶14

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.

¶15

ANDHRA PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, REP.BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 5TH FLOOR, NEAR C G 0 COMPLEX, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520007.

¶16

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KUNROOL.

¶17

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER APTDC DIVISION, KURNOOL, KUNROOL DIST

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.DASARI S V V S V PRASAD

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶22

1.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

¶23

2.GP FOR TOURISM(AP)

¶24

3.SRINIVASULA REDDY VAJRALA SC FOR APTDC Ltd

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

ORAL ORDER:

¶27

Smt. K. Srilakshmi, learned Counsel representing Sri Dasari S.V.V.S.V. Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on Instructions, submits that the Petitioner has received the entire amount and no further consideration is necessary.

¶28