Smt.N.Uma Lakshmi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. N.Uma Lakshmi, W/o Late K.Srinivasa Reddy, Aged 47 years. Unaided Lecturer in Chemistry, C/o Narapa Reddy. N.V, Shivalingam Street, Musinuru, Kavali Municipality, SPSR Nellore District.

¶11

...Petitioner

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.

¶14

Commissioner for Collegiate Education, ANT Towers, Prasadampadu, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶15

Jawahar Bharathi Degree College, Kavali - 524201, SPSR Nellore District, Rep by Its Correspondent.

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, i. declaring the Memo No.6053/CE.A.I /2017 dated 30.11.2018 of the 1st respondent and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Procs.Rc.No.30/Admn.li-A-l/2016 dated

¶18

21.11.2018, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and consequently to setaside the same and ii. consequently to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to absorb the petitioner into as aided Lecturer in Chemistry with all consequential benefits, on par with other unaided Lecturers who were absorbed in pursuant to the directions of this Hon'ble court. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the writ affidavit, it is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption as aided Lecturer of chemistry^{dehorstheMemo} NO.6053/CE.A.I/2017 dated 30.11.2018 of the 1st respondent and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent vide Procs.Rc.No.30/Admn.ll-A-l/2016 dated 21.12.2018, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶19

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to continue the petitioner in service as lecturer in chemistry pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. N BHARAT BABU

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: -

¶24

The Court made the following order:

¶25

%

¶26

APHC010069692022

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

FRIDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶29

PRESENT

¶30

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶31

WRIT PETITION NO: 4409/2022

Between;

Smt.n.uma Lakshmi

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶37

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶38

1.N BHARAT BABU

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

¶40

The Court made the following:

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

The present writ petition is filed for the following^relief:

¶43

“....to issue an order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureof} writ of Mandamus (i)declaring the Memo No.6053/CEAI/2017^dated 30.11.2018 of the respondent and the consequential^proceedings of the 2''^ respondent vide Procs.Rc.No.30/Admn IIAI/2016, dated 21.11.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and^{consequentlyto} set aside the same and (ii) consequently to direct^{therespondents} 1 and 2 to absorb the petitioner into as aided Lecturer^{inChemistrywith} all consequential benefits on par with other unaided^Lecturerswho were absorbed in pursuant to the directions of this^Hon'ble court

¶44

2

¶45

(Hi) and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble^Courtmay deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case..."

¶46

Heard Sri N. Bharat Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing^forthe Official respondents.

¶47

On hearing, both the learned counsels submits that^{theissueinvolvedin} order of this Court in Writ this petition is squarely covered by the common Petition No.8561 of 2021 and batch, dated 02.01.2025. The operative^portion of the said common order is as under;

¶48

'Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, directing the to submit individual applications to the respondents within a petitioners period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of^{acopyofthisorder,along} with relevant annexure, such as, the appointment letter,^{servicerecordif} any available with the appellants and any other document^{relatingtotheir} claim for absorption into aided posts. On receipt of the^{applications,the} respondents shall pass appropriate orders preferably^{withinaperiodof} eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of applications.”

¶49

In view of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is also^disposedof in terms of the above said common order in Writ Petition^No.8561 of 2021 and batch, dated 02.01.2025, directing the petitioner to submit individual applications to the respondents within a period of^{six(6)weeksfromthedate} of this order, along with relevant annexure, such as,^the of receipt of a copy available with the appellants and appointment letter, service record if any any other document relating to their claim for absorption^{intoaidedposts.On} receipt of the applications, the respondents shall^{passappropriateorders}

¶50

I

¶51

3

¶52

period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of preferably within a applications. No costs.

¶53

of the Order in Writ Petition 5. Registry is directed to attach a copy No.8561 of 2021 and batch, dated 02.01.2025, to this Order. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if^any shall stand

¶54

closed.

¶55

Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER

¶56

To,

¶57

The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department,^{StateofAndhra} Pradesh, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra^Pradesh.

¶58

Commissioner for Collegiate Education, ANT Towers,^{Prasadampadu,} Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶59

The Correspondent Jawahar Bharathi Degree College,^{Kavali-524201,} SPSR Nellore District.

¶60

One CC to Sri. N Bharat Babu Advocate [OPUC]

¶61

Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court Of^{AndhraPradesh.} [OUT]

¶62

Three CD Copies

¶63

(Along with a copy of the order in Writ Petition No.^8561of2021 and batch dated 02.01.2025)

GSC

HIGH COURT

DATED:03/01/2025

ORDER

WP.No.4409 of 2022

DISPOSING OF THE WP

WITHOUT COSTS

t

€

APHC010154052021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3310] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶75

THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶76

PRESENT

¶77

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶78

WRIT PETITION Nos: 8561. 8614, 8625. 8721. 8794, 8804,^8929,8956, 8958. 8967. 10092. 10610. 10614. 10618. 10753. 10756,^{14683,14951and} 15156 of 2021

¶79

W.P.No.8561 of 2021:

¶80

Between:

¶81

Smt. Devarapalli Jessi Padma,

¶82

...PETITIONER

¶83

AND

¶84

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶85

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶86

K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

¶87

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶88

1.RAVULA NAGARJUNA

¶89

2.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

¶90

The Court made the following Common Order:

¶91

Today, when the matters are taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Satyanara^yana Murthy, Mr.V.Sai Kumar, Mr.V.Padmanabha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners conjointly submits that, these matters^{aresquarelycoveredbyan}

¶92

2

¶93

order of this Court passed in W.P.No.10389 of 2021, dated 08.08.2024 and requests this Court to pass similar order in these writ petitions.

¶94

On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education vehemently argued that these matters are not covered matters and the respondents have filed Writ Appeals challenging the order of this Court dated 08.08.2024 passed in W.P.No.10389 of 2021 and the same were disposed of vide common judgment dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.A.Nos.1193 of 2023 and batch. The operative portion reads as follows:

¶95

“ respondents shall submit individual applications^to the appellants within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of this order. The respondents shall also submit the relevant annexures, such as, the appointment letter, service record if any available with the respondents and any other document relating to their claim for absorption into aided posts. 12. The appellants shall pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of 8 (eight) weeks after receipt of such representations from the respondents. With these observations, the writ appeals are disposed off without costs. ”

¶96

In view of the submissions of both the learned counsels, this Court is inclined to dispose of these writ petitions in terms of the common Judgment dated 23.08.2024 passed in W.A.Nos.1193 of 2023 and batch.

¶97

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, directing the petitioners to submit individual applications to the respondents within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, along with relevant annexure, such as, the appointment letter, service record if any available with the appellants and any other document relating to their claim for

¶98

€

¶99

3

¶100

absorption into aided posts. On receipt of the applications, the respondents shall pass appropriate orders preferably within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of applications. No costs.

¶101

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶102

Dr. K. MANMADHA RAO, J

¶103

BMS

Smt.N.Uma Lakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.N.Uma Lakshmi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V S Reddy Vs The Executive Engineer

C.H.Joel Raj, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr.S.v.Rama Murthy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M Venkata Ramana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mallampati Chennareddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Srinivasa Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh