Writ petition challenging a Form-1 notice issued by the Endowments Department concerning a temple. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE --
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 43839 OF 2016
Between:
Dwarampudi Sri Atchi Reddy, S/o.Adi Reddy, aged about 65 years R/o.Gollala Mamidada, Pedapudi Mandal, East GodavariDistrict. ...PETITIONEFU
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226"of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction moreparticularly onein the
nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring Form-1 Notice in Rc.No.B1/25088/2016-8, dated 29-10-2016 issued by the Respondent No.2 in respect to the 6th Respondent Temple, situated at Gollala Mamidada, Pedapudi Mandal, East Godavari District asarbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, and contrary to the provisions of A.P.Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, andAppointment of Trustees Rules. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 54102 OF 2016) ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Form-1 Notice in Rc.No.BI/25088/2016-8, dated 29-10-2016 issued by the Respondent No.2 in respecttothe 6 th Respondent Temple, situated at Gollala Mamidada, Pedapudi Mandal East Godavari District, pending disposal of the aboveWritPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.NAVEEN KUMAR REPRESENTING
SRI P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS ^ The Court made the following: ORDER
w
APHC010089972016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3458]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 43839/2016
Between:
Atchi Reddy ...Petitioner
AND
PrI Secy Endowments Dept 5 Others and Others ...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: P R K Amerandra Kumar Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP for Endowments (AP)
The Court made the following order:
Sri T.Naveen Kumar, learned counsel representing SriP.R.K.Amerandra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present writ petition. Therefore, the writ petitionbecomesinfructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
gi
HIGH COURT
DATED: 10/03/2025
ORDER
WP.No.43839 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dwarampudi Sri Atchi Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Department
The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of A.P.
The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Kakinada
The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Rajamahendravaram
The Inspector, Endowments Department, Kakinada
Kiranmayee Mandava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
