Dismissed¶31

Pothula Ranga Rao v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Nov 2025WP/32488/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; W.P.No.32488 of 2025; writ petition under Article 226; habeas corpus; detenu Pothula Sudeepthi; petitioner Pothula Ranga Rao; respondents include State of AP (Home Dept.), Director General of Police, Superintendent of Police West Godavari, SHO Dwaraka Tirumala Police Station; counsel G.Sri Harsha withdrew petition at threshold; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; interlocutory applications closed; decided 22.11.2025 by Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy and Justice Tuhin Kumar Gedela.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition ¶31

Pothula Ranga Rao Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3558]

¶2

APHC010629462025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

SATURDAY,TH E TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOV E MBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 32488/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

POTHULA RANGA RAO, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, HIN D HU, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O. S W ARNAVARIGUDEM, JEERLUGU M ILLI MANDAL WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT .

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE O F AP, REPRESENTED BY IT S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, H O ME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIA T BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT V ELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANG A LAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶15

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVA R I DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION H O USE OFFICER, DWAFAKA TIRU M ALA POLICE STATION, DWAR A KA TIRUMALA, WEST GODAVARI D ISTRICT.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Petition under Artic l e 226 of the Constitution of India pr a ying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hig h Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or a direction more particularly one in th e nature of Writ of Habeas Corp u s directing the respondent No.3 and 4 to trace the whereabouts of deten u s viz., Pothula Sudeepthi to produce th e detenus before this Hon'ble court a n d to pass

¶18

¶19

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.32488 of 2025

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.G SRI HARSHA

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶24

¶25

CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.32488 of 2025

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

¶28

Mr. G.Sri Harsha, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to

¶29

withdraw the writ petition.

¶30

Permission is accorded.

¶31

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

¶34

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

¶35

Date: 22.11.2025 MDP

Pothula Ranga Rao v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pothula Ranga Rao v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thippiri Gangadhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V Devi Satya Sri Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Vs Sri B.Sankaraiah

Kandregula Siva Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Pangi Ramesh Vs the State of Ap

Sk Siddiq Ahmed Vs the State of Ap