Dunga Srinivasa Rao Vs the State of Ap

MADHUPADA LALITHA KUMARI,, D/O MADHUPADA RAMA RAO, FAMALE, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. H.NO.3-34, CHENULA AGRHARAM, KONDAPALEM CHIVARA, ANAKAPALLI MANDEL, KONDUPALEM, PO, VISAKHAPATANAM DISTRICT. 3.

¶12

DAKAMMARI BALAJI, S/O D. SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O KAILASAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4.

¶13

ANGUDU SIMHACHALAM,, S/O A. SHEETTHARAM, AGED ABOUT 45, R/O D.NO. 5-608/24, THOTAGARUVU, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5.

¶14

DUNDI TRINADHA RAO,, S/O TRINADH, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 46-9-22, RAMALAYAM STREET, DONAPARITH, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6

¶15

. NAMBALA APPARAO, S/O RANGAYYA, MALE, AGED ABOUT65 YEARS, R/O 71-GF-7, MARIKAVALASA, RAJIV GRUHA KALPA, PARADESHIPALEM PO., KOTHAPARADESIPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶16

...PETITIONER(S)

¶17

AND

¶18

THE STATE OF AP, REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION) A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,

¶19

2

¶20

HN,J W.P.No.32034 of 2025

¶21

AMARAVATHI 2.

¶22

THE VISAKHAPATNAM GREATER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPT. BY COMMISSIONER, DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM,VISAKHAPATNAMDISTRICT. 3.

¶23

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, REPT. BY ITS COLLECTOR, MAHARANI PETA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,

¶24

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶25

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toFor the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the petitioners herein prays that this Honorable court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or appropriate writ to 1) declare the inaction of the Respondent Nos.2 3 in completing the process in view of the Notification vide No.361/H5/2016/U.C.D Dt.20.09.2022 pending before them to constitute Town Vending Committee for Greater Visakha Municipal Corporation Street Vending Committee as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of provisions of the section 22 of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulations of Street Vending) Act, 2014 and Rule 4(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules, 2017. and Consequently 2) To direct the Respondents 2 3 to issue an Order constituting Town Vending Committee for Greater Visakha Municipal Corporation Street Vending Committee by completing the process in view of the Notification vide NO.361/H-5/2016/U.C.D Dt.20.09.2022 pending before them or to pass any other order or orders in the interest of Justice.

¶26

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.2 & 3 to complete the process in view of the Notification vide No.361/H-5/2016/U.C.D Dt.20.09.2022 regarding constitution of Town Vending Committee pending before them, pending disposal of this writ petition and to pass

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.V RAJA MANOHAR

3

HN,J

W.P.No.32034 of 2025

¶33

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶34

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶35

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶36

4

¶37

HN,J W.P.No.32034 of 2025

¶38

The Court made the following Order:

¶39

This present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the proposal to constitute a Committee for identification of street vending areas and the subsequent proceedings initiated in pursuance of the Andhra Pradesh Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Rules, 2017.

¶40

Mr. A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2^nd respondent submits that the Street Vendors Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending Act, 2014 would mandate the procedure for identification of areas for street vending.

¶41

Section 21 of the Act pertains to plan for street vending and Chapter VII

¶42

of the Act from Sections 22 to 26, deals with the constitution of Town Vending Committee.

¶43

It is submitted that Committees have been constituted in pursuance of the Act and also the directions of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(PIL)No.81 of 2025 and 103 of 2025.

¶44

Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶45

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶46

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶47

Date: 24.11.2025 PGT

Dunga Srinivasa Rao v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dunga Srinivasa Rao v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J. Kondala Rao, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

P. Venkata Ramana Vs Government of Andhra PRadesh

M/s.Maruthi Engineering Company, Visakaptnam. Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Guttula Venkata Satynarayana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mohammad Naseema Begum Vs the State of Ap

Divve Rukmangda Raghuram Vs the State of Ap