D L Rao v. Prl.Secy., Education Dept., Gun., & 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court (Amaravati), W.P. No. 31617 of 2017, D. L. Rao v. Principal Secretary, Education Department, Guntur and 4 Others, decided 10.04.2025 by Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam. Petition challenging retirement of a sweeper at 58 years against claimed 60-year superannuation under AP Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (AFRC) 2015, invoking Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, against intimation letter Ref:BEC/PF/669 dated 3.7.2017; dismissed as infructuous on counsel's report of subsequent events; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; no adjudication on merits.
What did the court decide?
Since learned counsel for the petitioner reported that, in view of subsequent events in the lis, the writ petition had become infructuous and no further orders were required, the Court recorded the submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. The merits of the superannuation-age grievance were not decided.