shaik Rahamad v. The Commissioner of Prohibition andExcise Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of writ petition transferred from APAT No. 24/2021; Shaik Rahamad v. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others; petitioner continuing service in State of Telangana; cause does not survive; interim order vacated; miscellaneous petitions closed; decided 02.01.2025 by Smt Justice Sumathi Jagadam, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition (AT) dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; interim order granted earlier vacated; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶20