Vinayaka Communication v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Short closure order in Writ Petition No. 20607 of 2025, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, dated 11.08.2025, by Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad. Petitioner: Vinayaka Communication (rep. by M. Sambi Reddy, Tadikonda village, Guntur district). Respondents: State of AP, Department of Energy; APCPDCL (Chairman & MD); Superintending Engineer, APCPDCL Guntur Division; Divisional Engineer, Tadikonda Division. Counsel: G Sri Harsha for the petitioner; GP for Energy and V V Satish (SC for APEPDCL) for the respondents. The petition was closed because the petitioner's grievance was stated to have been redressed; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, stood closed. No statutory provisions or judicial precedents were cited or considered; useful only for recording disposal/status, not for precedent value.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; the writ petition was closed on the submission that the Petitioner's grievance stood redressed, with no order as to costs, and interlocutory applications, if any, were directed to stand closed in terms of the order.