Dismissed¶33

Gosala Subba Rami Reddy v. The Executive Engineer

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Dec 2025WP/18595/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; non-prosecution; no representation; writ of mandamus; Article 226; Articles 21 and 300-A; Proceedings No. 45 KE dated 28-8-2009; Irrigation & CAD Department, Kavali, Nellore; Section 151 CPC stay petition; WPMP 24310 of 2009; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Justice V.Sujatha; Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; decided 24.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for default: the petitioner made no representation on 16.12.2025, 22.12.2025 and 24.12.2025 (the matter last listed under the caption 'for dismissal') and appeared to be not evincing interest in the case; accordingly the petition was dismissed with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending were directed to stand closed. ¶33

Gosala Subba Rami Reddy Vs The Executive… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3333]

¶2

APHC010066812009

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 18595/2009

¶9

Between:

¶10

GOSALA SUBBA RAMI REDDY, S/O. RAMANA REDDY AGRICULTURIST R/O. KRISHNAPADU, SOMAVARAPADU POST, JALADANKI MANDAL,

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & CAD DEPARTMENT NELLORE NORTH DIVISION, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶14

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION & CAD DEPARTMENT KAVALI EAST DIVISION, KAVALI, NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the Proceedings No. 45 KE, dated 28-8-2009 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide, violation of principles of natural justice, and in violation of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently set-aside the same.

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2009(WPMP 24310 OF 2009

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further sproceedings purusant to the Proceedings No. 45 KE, dated

¶19

¶20

VS,J W.P.No.18595 of 2009

¶21

28-8-2009, issued by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of above Writ Petition.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶23

1.P NARASIMHULU

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶25

1.GP FOR IRRIGATION & COMM AREA DEV

¶26

2.5644/MD MUBARIZ

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

¶29

VS,J W.P.No.18595 of 2009

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

When the writ petition came up for hearing on 16.12.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, as such, the matter was posted to 22.12.2025. Even on 22.12.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called, the matter was directed to be posted on 24.12.2025, under the caption ‘for dismissal’.

¶32

Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the present case.

¶33

In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.

¶35

_____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶36

24.12.2025 Gss

Gosala Subba Rami Reddy v. The Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gosala Subba Rami Reddy v. The Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K Chandrasekhar Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

M/s Sri Lakshmi Fertilizers, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Adigarla Demudu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Pocha Venkata Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Bhoopalam Srinivasulu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri Kattamuri Venkata Koteswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh