Dismissed¶69

T Ratna Sekhar Reddy v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Jul 2025WP/1563/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court Amaravati; Writ Petition 1563 of 2025; withdrawal of writ petition; mandamus; obstruction/protrusion of electricity transformers (100+100 KV, 3 Phase) into public street; Kanyaka Parameswari Temple street, Dharmavaram; Sri Sathya Sai District; APSPDCL; Dharmavaram Municipality; Article 226; Articles 14, 21, 300-A; Section 151 CPC; dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; interlocutory application(s), if any, stood closed in terms of the order. ¶69

T Ratna Sekhar Reddy Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010027092025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

^ .

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1563 OF 2025 /’

¶8

Between;

¶9

T Ratna Sekhar Reddy, S/o T. Narayana Reddy, aged about 60 years, Timber business, D.No.7/169-1, Madhava Nagar Street, Madhava Nagar, Dharmavaram Town, Sri Sathya Sai District, (Erstwhile Ananthapuram District).

¶10

...Petitioner

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi.

¶13

The Chief Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L, Tirupathi, State of Andhra Pradesh,

¶14

The Superintendent Engineer, (Electrical) Sri Sathya Sai District, (Erstwhile Ananthapuram District)

¶15

The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Electrical) Dharmavaram Sri Sathya Sai District.

¶16

The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Electrical) Dharmavaram, Sri Sathya Sai District.

¶17

The Commissioner, Dharmavaram Municipality, Dharmavaram. Sri Sathya Sai District, (Erstwhile Ananthapuram District).

¶18

• V

¶19

Rangam Lakshmi. W/o Rangam Adinarayana, Aged about 45 years, Door No.9/130-2, Varalakshmi Theatre Road, Dharmavaram Town, Sri Sathya Sai District, (Erstwhile Ananthapuram District).

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents more particularly the respondents 2 to 6 in not preventing the 7‘^ respondent from installing the two 100+100 KV electric transformers (3 Phase) in Kanyaka Parameswari Temple street, protruding in to the public street in Dharmavaram Town and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District (Erstwhile Ananthapuramu District), or to relocate the same at some other safe place in order to avoid any danger to the life of the residents residing at and around Kanyaka Parameswari Temple street, to the vehicles moving in the street, to the by passers to the workers in the timber depot of the petitioner and to the school children, as illegal, arbitrary, untenable and in violation of the principles of natural justice and against to the fundamental rights under Article 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents more particularly the respondents 2 to 6 to remove or to relocate the two 100+100 KV electric transformers (3 Phase) being installed by the 7th respondent in the public street in Dharmavaram Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District (Erstwhile Ananthapuramu District)

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents more particularly the respondents 2 to 6 to take steps to prevent the 7th respondent from installing the two 100 +100 KV electric transformers (3 Phase) in Kanyaka Parameswari Temple street, protruding in to the public street in Dharmavaram Town and Mandal,

¶23

¶24

Sri Sathya Sai District (Erstwhile Ananthapuramu District), in order to avoid any danger to the residents residing at and around Kanyaka Parameswari Temple street, to the vehicles moving in the street, to the by passers, to the workers in the timber depot of the petitioner and to the school children, pendency of the Writ Petition

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S KRISHNA REDDY

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL

¶27

Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 3 to 6: GP FOR ENERGY <7 Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI O UDAYA KUMAR

¶28

The Court made the following order:

[3328]

APHC010027092025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶33

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶34

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶35

PRESENT

¶36

honourable SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶37

WRIT PETITION NO: 1563/2025

¶38

Between:

¶39

1.T Pj^YNA SEKHAR REDDY S/0 T.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 years timber business, D.NO.7/169-1, MADHAVA NAGAR Street, madhava nagar, dharmavaram town, sri sathya gj^jpiSTRlCT, (ERSTWHILEANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT).

¶40

...PETITIONER

¶41

AND

¶42