V.Hari Priya, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V.MANJU BHARGHAVI,, W/O. V.VISHNU BHAGAVAN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC- ARCHAKA, R/O. H.NO.3/116, PEDDAPASUPULA VILLAGE, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

¶13

VARAM PRAVALLIKA,, W/O. V.PAVAN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC- ARCHAKA, R/O. H.NO.3-1, VELLALA VILLAGE, RAJUPALAM MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT.

¶14

...PETITIONER(S)

¶15

AND

¶16

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶17

THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, OPP.S GRAND RESTAURANT, ONE CENTER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶18

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

¶19

2

¶20

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, OPP- NEHRU PARK, CO-OPERATIVE COLONY, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT.

¶21

SRI MADHAVA SWAMY TEMPLE, PEDDAPASUPULA VILLAGE, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GROUP TEMPLES, JAMMALAMADUGU

¶22

SRI ANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, PEDDAPASUPULA VILLAGE, PEDDAMUDIUM MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GROUP TEMPLES, JAMMALAMADUGU

¶23

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶24

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.5 and 6 in proposing to conduct public auction scheduled be held on 28.05.2022 for granting lease hold rights for the land in an extent of Ac.18.71 cents in Sy.No.163, Ac.12.24 cents in Sy.No.199 and Ac.17.03 cents in Sy.No.543 of Peddapasupula Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R. District, which is personal service Inam burdened with service to the deities of Sri Anjaneya Swamy and Madhava Swamy Temples situated at Peddapasupula Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R. District, by circulating Phamplates, dated 13.05.2022 as highly illegal,' colorable exercise of power, contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 and also the settled principles of legal position apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioners under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to 6 not to grant lease hold rights for the land in an extent of Ac.18.71 cents in Sy.No.163, Ac.12.24 cents in Sy.No.199 and Ac.17.03 cents in Sy.No.543 of Peddapasupula Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R. District without considering petitioners candidature for absorption as permanent Archakas of Sri Anjaneya Swamy and Madhava Swamy Temples situated at Peddapasupula Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R. District by fixing pay scales attached to the posts of Archakas and pass

¶25

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶26

3

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of auction scheduled to be held on 28.05.2022 for grant of lease hold rights for the land in an extent of Ac.18.71 cents in Sy.No.163, Ac.12.24 cents in Sy.No.199 and Ac.17.03 cents in Sy.No.543 of Peddapasupula Village, Peddamudium Mandal, Y.S.R. District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶28

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dismiss the WP No. 15432 of 2022, by vacating the interim orders passed on 26-05-2022 in I.A. NO. 1 of 2022 in WP.NO.15432 of 2022, since the same is devoid of merits in the interest of Justice

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶31

1.V V N NARASIMHAM

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶33

1.T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION)

¶34

2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶35

The Court made the following:

¶36

ORDER:

¶37

Heard Sri V.V.N. Narasimham, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri T. Venu Gopal, Standing Counsel for Endowments, appearing for the respondents.

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the relief sought in the Writ Petition would not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in the Writ Petition.

¶39

4

¶40

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶41

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶42

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand

¶43

closed.

¶44

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA