Geddam Vijaya Harsha Kumar v. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
AP High Court Amaravati; W.P. No. 13811 of 2025; Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam; decided 05.06.2025; writ petition disposed (not withdrawn, not dismissed); permission for prayer meeting/public meeting in memory of Praveen Pagadala on 24.05.2025 at Rajahmundry; grievance of inaction by respondents nos.2 and 5 (Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari); Articles 14, 19 & 21; Article 226 mandamus; Andhra Pradesh Police Act 1991; Andhra Pradesh Police Manual Rules; withdrawal with liberty; fresh written representation with all prerequisites; disposal within four weeks in accordance with law; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no merits decided; no precedent engaged with.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with terms: the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh written representation with all prerequisites before the 2nd respondent-Superintendent of Police, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, who is directed to decide it in accordance with law preferably within four weeks of receipt; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stood closed.