Dismissed¶29

Vanamu Suryavathi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Jul 2025WP/1266/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition 1266/2019, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, decided 16.07.2025 by Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda J; dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives; Article 226 mandamus sought to compel enquiry into road-laying in Aryavatam/Ayavatam village, Kajuluru Mandal, East Godavari District, and alleged withdrawal of entire estimation amount by 5th respondent without complying with tender conditions; representations dated 26.07.2017, 22.10.2018, 25.10.2018; GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Development (AP); no merits adjudicated; no cases cited; no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous, learned counsel for the petitioners having submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. ¶29

Vanamu Suryavathi Vs the State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

[3329]

¶2

APHC010025372019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1266/2019

¶8

Between:

¶9

V SURYAVATHI, E.G.DIST.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF AP, E.G.DIST.

¶13

R, R

¶14

R, R

¶15

R, R

¶16

R, R

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents is illegal where the respondents 2 to 4 herein failed to initiate necessary action for conducting enquire about laying of roads in Ayavatam Village where the 5^th respondent withdrawn the entire estimatioin amount without complying render conditions is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of tender and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 herein to conduct enquire about the laying roads in Aryavatam village of Kajuluru Mandal as per the representations of the petitioners dated

¶19

26.07.2017 and 22.10.2018 and 25.10.2018 dated and pass such other order or orders

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.B S S PRASAD

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP)

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO: 1266/2019

¶26

This Court made the following

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Sri B.S.S. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous.

¶29

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶30

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

¶31

_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J

¶32

16.07.2025

¶33

Krk

¶34

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA