Second Appeal No. 772/2002, listing for dismissal under PSA, dismissed due to non-prosecution by absent parties.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending interlocutory applications stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010357512002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3368]
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 772/2002
Between:
P.narayanappadu
...APPELLANT
AND
P Appadu Dora Another
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following Judgment:
This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a
direction on 05.03.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation on either side.
2
for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Dated: 19.03.2025 PSA
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 772 of 2002
Date: 19.03.2025
PSA
P. Narayanappadu
P Appadu Dora Another
B V L N Chakravarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
