Dismissed
Valipi Venkata Lakshmamma & Another v. S. Iqbal Ahmad & Another
Andhra Pradesh HCMACMA/2204/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ■Jn:…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ■Jn:…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3520]
APHC010108162012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2204/2012
Between:
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased toagainst the Award and Decree dt. 15-3-2012 in OP No. 408 of 2010 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Anantapur (Before the Judge, Family Court-Cum-Additional District Judgte, Anantapur)
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
AHHS,J MACMA NO.2204 OF 2012
1.N RAMA KRISHNA
2.MD SALEEM
The Court made the following:
AHHS,J MACMA NO.2204 OF 2012
JUDGMENT:-
On 04.01.2024, 07.02.2024 and 07.08.2025 request was made by one Sri N.Vishnuvardhan Reddy, learned counsel, for entering appearance for the appellants.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA,J
Date: 22.08.2025 LSP
AHHS,J MACMA NO.2204 OF 2012
229
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2204 of 2012
Date: 22.08.2025 LSP
Valipi Venkata Lakshmamma
Valipi Venkatamma
S Iqbal Ahmad
The United India Insurance Co Ltd
A. Hari Haranadha Sarma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court