Dismissed¶33

T.Pakkerappa, v. K. Kondanna

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Dec 2025CRP/213/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: C.R.P.No.213 of 2024; APHC010014272024; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Justice V. Sujatha; Article 227 of the Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; E.P. No. 15 of 2023; O.S No. 361 of 2022; Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram; orders dated 29-09-2023; dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; garnishee; Assistant Accounts Officer, Electricity Revenue Office (ERT Office), Dharmavaram; APSPDCL; T. Pakkerappa; K. Kondanna; Bandi Srihari; Sk. Thabasum; Venkata Rama Rao Kota; A. Varalakshmi; decision date 08.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

None; the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions were ordered closed. ¶33

T.Pakkerappa, Vs K. Kondanna — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions were ordered closed.

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the Orders dated 29-09-2023 passed by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in E.P. No. 15 of 2023 in O.S No. 361 of 2022 should be set aside (issue inferred from the prayer; never adjudicated, as the petition was dismissed as infructuous).

¶15

Court's answer

Recording the petitioner's counsel's submission that no further cause survives in the matter and that it has become infructuous, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs.

¶33

Ratio / Principle

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Civil Revision petition shall stand closed.

¶34

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction), single bench of Justice V. Sujatha, order dated 08.12.2025 on Civil Revision Petition No. 213/2024. The petitioner, T. Pakkerappa, had filed the revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the orders dated 29-09-2023 passed by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in E.P. No. 15 of 2023 in O.S No. 361 of 2022, in which respondent No. 2, the Assistant Accounts Officer, Electricity Revenue Office (ERT Office), Dharmavaram, figured as garnishee. Accompanying applications included IA No. 1 of 2024 (condonation of 6 days' delay in filing, under Section 151 CPC) and IA No. 2 of 2024 (suspension of the impugned order pending disposal of the CRP, under Section 151 CPC). At hearing, Ms. Sk. Thabasum, representing Mr. Bandi Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that no further cause survives and the matter has become infructuous. Recording this submission, the Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, made no order as to costs, and directed that miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. No issue on the merits of the impugned orders was adjudicated.

¶1

APHC010014272024

¶2

[3333]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶7

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 213/2024

¶8

Between:

¶9

T.PAKKERAPPA,, S/O. T. KONDANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, R/O. MARKET STREET, DHARMAVARAM TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. (EARLIER ANANTHAPUR DT)

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

K KONDANNA, S/O. KATAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 18/179, MARKET STREET, DHARMAVARAM TOWN , SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. (EARLIER ANANTHAPUR DT)

¶13

THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE,(ERT OFFICE) DHARMAVARAM, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. (EARLIER ANANTHAPUR DT)(GARNSHEE)

¶14

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶15

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Orders dated 29-09-2023 passed by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in E.P. No. 15 of 2023 in O.S No. 361 of 2022, and allow the Revision Petition and pass

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (6 ) days in filing the above C.R.P. filed against the

¶18

¶19

VS,J C.R.P.No.213 of 2024

¶20

order dated 29-09-2023, passed by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in E.P. No. 15 of 2023 in O.S No. 361 Of 2022 and to pass

¶21

IA NO: 2 OF 2024

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order dated 29-09-2023 passed by the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dharmavaram in E.P. No. 15 of 2023 in O.S No. 361 of 2022, till pending of CRP and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.BANDI SRIHARI

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL

¶27

2.A VARALAKSHMI

¶28

The Court made the following:

¶29

¶30

VS,J C.R.P.No.213 of 2024

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Ms. Sk. Thabasum, learned counsel representing Mr. Bandi Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous.

¶33

Recording the above submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Civil Revision petition shall stand closed.

¶35

___________________

¶36

JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶37

Date: 08.12.2025 KGR

T.Pakkerappa, v. K. Kondanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Pakkerappa, v. K. Kondanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Arepalli Dhana Lakshmi, Vs Smt. Arepalli Nagamma

Shaik Tajuddin Vs Sistla Rama Krishna Somayaji

Alapati Srinivas Kumar Vs Alapati Seetharavamma

T Pakkerappa Vs K Kondanna

Chaprala John Suresh Babu Vs Siddabattuni Prabhu

Chaprala John Suresh Babu, Vs Siddabattuni Prabhu, (Died)