Dismissed¶35

Tholana Srinivas, Visakhapatnam., v. the State of Ap., Rep Pp and Anr.

Andhra Pradesh HC23 Sept 2025CRLRC/492/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tholana Srinivas v. The State of A.P. (Rep. by its Public Prosecutor) and Kolli Krishna Rao; Criminal Revision Case No. 492/2017 dismissed as withdrawn with permission of the Court; interim orders vacated; miscellaneous petitions (CRLRCMP 789, 1856, 22053 of 2017) closed; Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C.; Section 151 CPC; order dated 07.12.2016 in Crl.A.No.256/2015 (I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam); CC No.474 of 2015 (Special Magistrate-V, Visakhapatnam); suspension of compensation order dated 28.02.2017; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case ¶35

Tholana Srinivas, Visakhapatnam., Vs the State of Ap., Rep Pp and Anr. — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3369]

¶2

APHC010147752017

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 492/2017

¶9

Between:

¶10

THOLANA SRINIVAS, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O MOHANA RAO, AGED: 49 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-43-14, FLAT NO.C-3, MATHANGI RESIDENCY, PEDA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM-17

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD.

¶14

KOLLI KRISHNA RAO, S/O RAMASWAMY, AGED: 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-41-16/8, KAGITHALA STREET, PEDA WALTAIR, VISKHAPATNAM.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the judgment and sentence passed by the court of the 1st Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam dated 7-12-2016 in Crl.A.No.256/2015 confirming the judgment and altering the sentence passed by the Special Magistrate-V, Visakhapatnam in CC No.474 of 2015 dated 16-7-2015.

¶17

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 789 OF 2017

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant him bail on such terms and conditions as deemed fit by suspending the

¶19

judgment and sentence of the Special Magistrate-V, Visakhapatnam dated 160V-2015 in CC No.474 of 2015 as confirmed and altered by the 1st Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam . in Crl.Appeal No. 256 of 2015 dated 07-122016 during the pendency of the above Criminal Revision in the interest of justice and to pass such other and further order or orders as deemed fit and proper.

¶20

IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1856 OF 2017

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time of SIX WEEKS which was granted to pay the amount while granting suspension of the order of compensation vide orders dt.28.02.2017 for a further period of SIX weeks from the date of receipt of the orders in this criminal revision miscellaneous petition in the interest of justice and to pass

¶22

IA NO: 4 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 22053 OF 2017

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.K SARVA BHOUMA RAO

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶28

2.N PAVAN KUMAR

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO

¶30

Criminal Revision Case No.492 of 2017

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 07.12.2016 passed in Crl.A.No.256 of 2015, on the file of the learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam.

¶33

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition.

¶34

Permission is accorded.

¶35

Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

¶36

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶37

________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J

¶38

Date: 24.09.2025 M K K

Tholana Srinivas, Visakhapatnam., v. the State of Ap., Rep Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tholana Srinivas, Visakhapatnam., v. the State of Ap., Rep Pp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.M.Rajeswar Rao, Visakapatnam & 6 Othrs., Vs State, Rep Sho, III Town Ps., Visakapatnam -Pp.

M.Sankar, Chittoor Dt., Vs M.Krishnaiah Chetty (Died) & 2 Otrs., Rep Pp.

Palika Srinivasa Kumar & Another Vs the State of A.P.

G.Srinivasa Reddy Vs State of Ap., & Another

Vanapalli Yesu Prabhu Vs Alluri Surya Chandrudu & the State of A.P.

Chandaka Ravi, Vizianagaram Vs the State of a.P., Rep. by Pp.