Disposed¶66

Talluri Anil Kumar & 2 Others v. Talluri Anitha & Another

Andhra Pradesh HC5 May 2025CRLRC/279/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal revision disposed as compromised; out-of-court settlement; matter infructuous; DVC No.10 of 2012; maintenance amount and cost; stay not granted; Crl.MP.No.8/2014; Crl.A.No.30 of 2014; XI Metropolitan Magistrate Cyberabad L.B. Nagar; Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge Cyberabad; Sections 397 & 401 CrPC; Section 482 Cr.P.C.; CRLRCMP No.471 of 2014; Talluri Anil Kumar v. Talluri Anitha; State of Andhra Pradesh; High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief adjudicated; the Criminal Revision Case was disposed of as compromised on the submission of an out-of-court settlement between the petitioners and respondent No.1, with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, were closed. ¶66

Talluri Anil Kumar & 2 Others Vs Talluri Anitha & Another — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HC
I r i dO
■n ■n

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATJ^V

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY

¶4

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 279 OF 2014

¶8

Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of CrPC, Aggrieved by the order dated 04-02-2014 passed in Crl.MP.No.8/2014 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad in partly allowing and with regarding not granting stay oh the maintenance amount and cost passed by the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar in Crl.A.No.30 of 2014 in DVC No.10 of 2012 dated 09-12-2013.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Talluri Anil Kumar, S/o T.Jayaraj, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o D.No.15-105, Hanuman Nagar Near water Tank, Eluru West Godavari District

¶11

Talluri Jayaraj, Aged 57 years, Occ; Business, R/o D.No.15-105, Hanuman, Nagar Near water Tank, Eluru, West Godavari^District

¶12

Talluri Rajasri, W/o T.Jayaraj, Aged about 52 years, Occ; Housewife, R/o D.No.15-105, Hanuman Nagar, Near water Tank, Eluru^WestGodavari District

¶13

...Petitioners/ Accused

¶14

AND

¶15

1 ./^Uurk Anitha, W/o T.Anil Kumar, Aged about 32 years, Occ: Private * Emprovee, R/o Flat No.404, Sri Venkatadri Nivas, Raod No.3 Margadarshi - ^Colony, Kothapet, Saroornagar, R.R. District

¶16

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP., Amaravati.

¶17

...Respondents/ Complainant

¶18

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rCRLRCMP. NO: 471 OF 2014^

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in DVC No. 10/2012 on the file of XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar dated 09-12-2013 pending disposal of the above CRLRC

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVASU representing^SRIK.J.V.N. PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶22

The Court made the following:

¶23

¶24

APHC010066922014

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶26

[3521]

¶27

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

¶29

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶30

PRESENT

¶31

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶32

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 279/2014

¶33

Between:

¶34

Talluri Anil Kumar & 2 Others

¶35

...PETITIONER(S)

¶36

AND

¶37

Talluri Anitha Another

¶38

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶39

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶40

1.KJ VN PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU

¶41

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶42

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶43

The Court made the following:

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

Mr. K. Srinivasu, teamed counsel, representing Sri K.J.V.N. Pundareekakshudu, the learned counsel for the petitioners,^{submitsthatthe} matter has become infructuous as the dispute in between the petitioners and

¶46

the respondent No.1, was settled out of the Court.

¶47