Disposed¶52

Anukula Sowmya v. Anukula John

Andhra Pradesh HC4 May 2025CRLRC/1528/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court criminal revision disposed as compromised; Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance petition (FCOP.No. 1517 of 2011, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam) dismissed 19-02-2015; revision under Sections 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. by minor petitioners through mother/guardian; District Legal Services Authority report recording receipt of permanent alimony; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; parties Anukula Sowmya, Anukula Sreya v. Anukula John and State of Andhra Pradesh; decided 05.05.2025.

What did the court decide?

No further monetary relief ordered in this revision; the Criminal Revision Case was disposed of as compromised in view of the District Legal Services Authority report recording that the petitioner had received permanent alimony; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed.

Anukula Sowmya Vs Anukula John — Maintenance and Alimony | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶52

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam (recording that the petitioner received permanent alimony), the Criminal Revision Case challenging the dismissal of the Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance petition could be disposed of as compromised.

¶51

Court's answer

In view of the report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam (submitted based on the report of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, recording receipt of permanent alimony), the revision case could be disposed of as compromised.

¶51

Ratio / Principle

The Criminal Revision Case was disposed of as compromised, and there shall be no order as to costs.

¶52

Key takeaways

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.ratio¶53

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Dr Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao), order dated 05.05.2025 in Criminal Revision Case No. 1528 of 2015: Revision under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. by minor daughters Anukula Sowmya (16) and Anukula Sreya (13), through their mother and natural guardian Smt. Anukula Santha Kumari, aggrieved by the order dated 19-02-2015 of the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in FCOP.No. 1517 of 2011 dismissing their Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance petition against the father, Anukula John (Respondent No.1; State of Andhra Pradesh as Respondent No.2). On receipt of the report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam — submitted on the report of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court — stating that the petitioner received permanent alimony, the Court held the revision could be disposed of as compromised and accordingly disposed of the Criminal Revision Case as compromised, with no order as to costs, closing pending miscellaneous petitions as a sequel.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1528 OF 2015

¶6

Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, Aggrieved by the orders passed in FCOP.No. 1517 of 2011 dated 19-02-2015 by dismissing the petition filed under section 125 of Cr.P.C by the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam.

¶7

Between;

¶8

Anukula Sowmya, D/o. Sri Anukula John, aged 16 years,

¶9

(Anukula Sreya, D/o. Sri Anukula John, aged 13 years, (petitioners 1 & 2 being minors, represented by their^{motherandnatural} guardian, Smt.Anukula Santha Kumari, D/o.Sri Duppati Danial, aged 42 years, R/o. D.No. 49-35-21/A.N.G.Os. Colony, Pioneer Residency, Akkayyapalem-16)

¶10

...Appellants / Petitioners

¶11

AND

¶12

Anukula John, S/o. Esekial, Teacher, aged 47 years, Working at Peddypalem, M.P.E.P.School, R/o. Rajugari Beeddu, Payakaraopeta Village, Payakaraopeta PS., Limits, Visakhapatnam District.

¶13

...Respondents / Respondents

¶14

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rept. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, Nelapadu.

¶15

BWf -r

¶16

...Respondents / Respondents

¶17

Coiihsfel for the Petitioner :SRI. INENI VENKATA PRASAD

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s. MADHAVI PRIYA^MANTENA

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶20

The Court made the following:

i*li

«'■ m APHC010232062015 la I □ Imm a

¶25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶26

[3521]

¶27

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶28

MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶29

PRESENT

¶30

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶31

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1528/2015

¶32

Between:

¶33

Anukula Sowmya and Others

¶34

...PETITIONER(S)

¶35

AND

¶36

Anukula John and Others

¶37

.„RESPONDENT(S)

¶38

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶39

INENI VENKATA PRASAD

¶40

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶41

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶42

2.MADHAV1 PRIYA MANTENA

¶43

The Court made the following:

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

The report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam, is received, wherein it is stated that^{thepetitionerreceived}

¶46

permanent alimony.

¶47

¶48

Dr. YLR, J - _ ^ Crl.R.C.No.l528 of 2015 ’• Dated 05.05.2025

¶49

\ \ N

¶50

In view of the report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam, which was submitted based on the report^{fromthelearned} Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam.

¶51