Dismissed¶31

Majji Venkataramanamurthy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC13 Nov 2025CRLP/2805/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.482 CrPC quash petition dismissed as withdrawn; petitioner Majji Venkataramanamurthy (Accused No.6); subject proceedings S.C.No.11 of 2020, Court of I Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu; offences under Sections 376, 343, 313, 493, 323, 354, 498-A, 420, 506 and 109 read with 34 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(V) of SCs & STs (PoA) Amendment Act, 2015; complainant Thuppata Adinarayanama; State of Andhra Pradesh; decided 14.11.2025 by Dr. Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; withdrawn at counsel's request, no merits considered, no precedent treatment.

What the court decided

AI extract

Majji Venkataramanamurthy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3396]

¶2

APHC010179432024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

¶5

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2805/2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

MAJJI VENKATARAMANAMURTHY, S/O. M. VENKANNA, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-318, PEDDAPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI.

¶14

THUPPATA ADINARAYANAMA, W/O. ORUGANTI LOVA RAJU AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. APPECHERLA VILLAGE, PEDDAVADAGURU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶15

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶17

1.G RAMA GOPAL

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶19

1.N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY

¶20

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶21

The Court made the following:

¶22

ORDER :

¶23

The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the Petitioner / Accused No.6 seeking to

¶24

quash the proceedings against him in S.C.No.11 of 2020 on the file of the

¶25

Court of I Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu for the offences under Sections 376, 343, 313, 493, 323, 354, 498-A, 420, 506 and 109 read with 34

¶26

¶27

IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(V) of SCs & STs (PoA) Amendment Act,

¶28

¶29

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that they intend to withdraw the petition and hence the petition may be disposed of.

¶30

3. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.

¶31

4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

_________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶34

Date:14.11.2025 Dinesh

¶35

¶36