Salma Shaik Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

Salma Shaik Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

APHC010006802023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3396]

FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 175/2023

Between:

SALMA SHAIK, W/O.SHAIKASHIQ ALI, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.11-3-45/A, KAILASHBHAVAN ROAD, CHENCHUPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI.

SAYED SHAKEERA, W/O.SARDHAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O.KAILASHBHAVAN ROAD, CHENCHUPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to quash the C.C No. 457 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Hon'ble Addl. Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Tenali, registered against the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner herein in C.C No.457 of 2022 on the file of Hon'ble Addl. Judicial 1st Class Magistrate, Tenali, pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1.SARANU PHANI TEJA

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

1.ABDUL HAMEED BAIG MOHAMAAD

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2

ORDER :

The instant Criminal Petition is filed by the Petitioner under Section 528 of

B.N.S.S., 2023 for the following relief:

“ ... to quash the C.C.No.457 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Hon'ble Addl. Judicial 1^st Class Magistrate, Tenali, registered against the petitioner and to pass ...”

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that there are case and counter cases pending between the parties and Petitioner herein is nothing to do with the offence alleged against her. She is falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel would submit that except bald and omnibus allegations, no specific overt acts are attributed against her.

During the course of hearing, learned counsel restricted the prayer and requested that the presence of the Petitioner may be dispensing with before the trial Court and the Criminal Petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioners to raise such contentions before the trial Court in defence.

Ms.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of and the Petitioner is at liberty to raise the present contentions before the trial Court in her defence. However, the presence of the Petitioner herein before the

3

trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial

Court.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Mjl/*

4

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Criminal Petition No. 175 of 2023

07.11.2025

Mjl /*