Dismissed¶¶47

Meda Nagaiah, v. Palaparthi Subba Rao

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Jul 2025CRLA/961/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Abatement of criminal appeal on death of sole accused; Meda Nagaiah v. Palaparthi Subba Rao; Criminal Appeal No. 961 of 2009; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J.; appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. by defacto complainant against acquittal in C.C.No.333 of 2006 (offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 I.P.C., II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tenali, judgment dated 09.04.2009); notice unserved; accused died 21.02.2017; death certificate and SHO report; appeal dismissed as abated on 10/07/2025; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated and miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending therein, stand closed. ¶¶47

Meda Nagaiah, Vs Palaparthi Subba Rao — Cheating and Forgery | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

■*3t.

'I r

APHC010173372009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶5

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY

¶8

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 961 OF 2009

¶9

Appeal under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C, against the Judgment dated 09.04.2009 passed in C.C.No.333 of 2006 on the file^ofthe II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District.

¶10

Between:

¶11

Meda Nagaiah, S/o.Subbaiah, aged about 59 years, R/o.Athota Village Tenali, Guntur District.

¶12

...Appellant/Complainant

¶13

AND

¶14

Palaparthi Subba Rao, S/o.Basavaiah, aged about 45 years, R/o.Brahmanakonduru, PonnurTaluq, Guntur District. (Accused)

¶15

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., atAmaravati.

¶16

...Respondents

¶17

Counsel for the AppellantiSri Ch.Ravindra Babu Counsel for the Respondent No.1: --

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent No.2:Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order:

¶19

/ /■

¶20

APHC010173372009

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶22

AT AMARAVATI

¶23

[3327i

¶24

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶25

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶26

PRESENT

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY

¶28

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 961/2009

Between:

Meda Nagaiah,

...APELLANT

AND

Palaparthi Subba Rao and Others

¶34

...RESPODENT(S)

¶35

Counsel for the Apellant;

¶36

1.CH RAVINDRA BABU

¶37

Counsel for the Respodent(S):

¶38

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶39

The Court made the following Judgment:

¶40

The Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 09.04.2009 in C.C.No.333 of 2006 passed by the^learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Tenali. By its judgment, dated 09.04.2009, 1®’ respondent/accused was found not guilty^ofthe offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 I.P.C^andwas acquitted of the charges leveled of him. Aggrieved by the same. the defacto complainant preferred the present criminal appeal. 2. Today when the appeal is taken up, it is brought to^the notice of this Court that the notice sent to the accused remained

¶41

¶42

SRK, J Crl.Appeal No.961 of 2009

¶43

unserved, and he died on 21.02.2017. A report of the^Station

¶44

House Officer concerned, along with copy of Death Certificate^of

¶45

1®‘ respondent/accused is forwarded by the learned II Additional

¶46

Junior Civil Judge, Tenali.

¶47