Dismissed¶25

Kandra Venkata Narayana v. Yaddanapudi Madhusudhana Rao

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Dec 2025CMA/557/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Guardian and Wards Act 1890 Sections 8 and 10; custody of minor; appointment of guardian of person and property; maternal grandfather as petitioner; minor attained majority; appeal infructuous; CMA dismissed; no costs; G.W.O.P.No.427 of 2012 (old No.153 of 2010); III Additional District Judge Guntur; Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Ravi Nath Tilhari J; Maheswara Rao Kuncheam J; decision dated 03.12.2025.

What did the court decide?

As per Paragraph 2 of the petition filed under Section 8 of the Act, the date of birth of the minor is 10.06.2006. ¶24

Kandra Venkata Narayana Vs Yaddanapudi Madhusudhana Rao — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010175162019

¶2

[3524]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 557/2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

KANDRA VENKATA NARAYANA, S/0. PITCHI RANGAIAH AGED 64 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED DY.S.P AND NOW WORKING AS JOINT EXECUTIVE OFFICER' VIGILANCE YSR AROGYA SRI R/O. PLOT.NO. 103, RAJANI GRAND APATMENTS, II LANE, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

YADDANAPUDI MADHUSUDHANA RAO, S/o. Parameswararao, Aged 44 years, R/o. 6th Lane, Brundavana Gardens, Guntur City and District, Andhra Pradesh.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶16

1.Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶18

¶19

The Court made the following:

¶20

¶21

RNT,J &MRK,J C.M.A.No.557 of 2019

¶22

JUDGMENT:- (per Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶23

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the order, dated 25.02.2019 passed in G.W.O.P.No.427 of 2012 (old No.153 of 2010) on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur, which was filed by the maternal grandfather of the ward under Sections 8 and 10 of Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, for custody of the minor and appointment of the appellant as guardian for the person and property of the minor, and said petition was dismissed.

¶24

From a perusal of Paragraph 2 of the petition filed under Section 8 of the Act, it is evident that the date of birth of the minor is 10.06.2006. Consequently, the minor has since attained majority, rendering the present appeal infructuous.

¶25