Disposed¶34

Kambaiahgari Bhaskar Reddy v. Sreedhar Cherukuri, IAS

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Apr 2025CC/563/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CC No.563 of 2025 (APHC010097262025), High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Special Original Jurisdiction), Ravi Cheemalapati, J., decided 08.04.2025. Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the High Court's order dated 04.10.2024 in W.P. No.29045 of 2022; closed upon recording counsel's submission of compliance; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed as prayed, recording compliance with the order dated 04.10.2024 in Writ Petition No.29045 of 2022; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending stand closed. ¶34

Kambaiahgari Bhaskar Reddy Vs Sreedhar Cherukuri, IAS — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010097262025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDA Y ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO T H OUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 563/2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

Kambaiahgari Bhask a r Reddy

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Sreedhar Cherukuri Ias and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S)

¶13

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶14

1.SODUM ANVE S HA

¶15

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶16

1.MANNAM VEN K ATA KRISHNA RAO

¶17

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 563/2025

¶18

The Court made the following Order:

¶19

This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 04.10.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.29045 of 2022.

¶20

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant

¶21

to the filing of contempt case, the authorities have complied with the order dated 04.10.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.29045 of 2022. As such, there remains nothing for adjudicating in this contempt case, as such prayed to close the Contempt Case.

¶22