Disposed¶41

Vanka Srinivasa Rao v. Sri Dinesh Kumar, I.A.S.

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Apr 2025CC/531/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; Contempt Case No. 531 of 2025; Vanka Srinivasa Rao vs Dinesh Kumar, I.A.S., District Collector, Alluri Seetha Rama Raju District; contempt for violating/non-implementation of order dated 27.04.2023 in W.P.No.9829 of 2023; Contempt of Courts Act 1971, Sections 10 to 12; petitioner's claim redressed; contempt case closed; no costs; Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda; decided 07-04-2025.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no order as to costs. ¶41

Vanka Srinivasa Rao Vs Sri Dinesh Kumar, I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶6

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 531 OF 2025

¶7

Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of^CourtsAct 1971, to initiate the proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act for not

¶8

implementing the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.9829/2023, dated 27.04.2023

¶9

Between;

¶10

Vanka Srinivasa Rao, S/o Venkata Satyanarayana, Age 39 yrs, Occ Contingent Employee, R/o Addategala Village and Mandal, Alluri Seetha Rama Raju District.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

Sri Dinesh Kumar, I.A.S., The District Collector, Alluri Seetha Rama Raju District at Paderu.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Counsel for the PetitionenSRI. K VENKATESH

¶16

Counsel for the Respondents:

¶17

The Court made the following:

¶18

APHC010057752025

¶19

¶20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶21

[3329]

¶22

MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL

¶23

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶24

PRESENT

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

¶26

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 531/2025

Between:

Vanka Srinivasa Rao

...PETITIONER

AND

Sri Dinesh Kumar I A S

¶32

...CONTEMNOR

¶33

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶34

1.KVENKATESH

¶35

Counsel for the Contemnor:

¶36

¶37

The Court made the following:

¶38

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

¶39

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for violating the order of this Court dated 27.04.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.9829 of 2023.

¶40

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that^theclaimof the petitioner was redressed by the respondents and^{nofurtherorders} are necessary in this contempt case.

¶41

Recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed.

¶42

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶43

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending^shallstand

¶44

closed.

¶45

SD/- E KAMESWARA RAO

¶46

JOINT REGISTRAR