Allowed¶25

M/s.G.v.P.R.Engineers Ltd. v. M/s. S.S.R.Engineers and Contractors

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Mar 2025AS/675/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: restoration of appeal dismissed for want of prosecution / default; sufficient cause; Section 151 CPC inherent power; counter-affidavit not filed; order dated 03.03.2025; order dated 30.07.2025; I.A.No.1 of 2025; A.S.No.675 of 2011; G.V.P.R. Engineers Ltd v. S.S.R.ngineers and Contractors; Visakhapatnam; appeal restored to original number; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

What did the court decide?

I.A.No.1 of 2025 allowed; order dated 30.07.2025 set aside as recorded, and Appeal Suit No. 675 of 2011 restored to its original number. ¶25

M/s.G.v.P.R.Engineers Ltd. Vs M/s. S.S.R.Engineers and Contractors — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHcoI 0235532011

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

the honourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶6

AND

¶7

the honourable SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

lA N0.1 OF 2025

¶9

¶10

APPEAL SUIT NO: 675 OF 2011

¶11

Between:

¶12

M/s.G.V.P.R.Engineers Ltd, Having its registered Office at Door No.82276, 1st Floor, Pavani Estate, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 033, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Adityasai Goparaju, S/o.Venkata Siva Prasad, aged about 30 years.

¶13

...Petitioner/Appellant

¶14

AND

¶15

M/s.S.S.R.ngineers and Contractors, rep. by its Proprietor^Ch.Venkata Ramaiah, Business, MIG 95, Sector 2, MVP colony, Visakhapatnam.

¶16

...Respondent/Respondent

¶17

Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC praying that^{inthecircumstances} stated in the affjci3vit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be

¶18

pleased to set aside the Order, dated 03.03.2025 passed by this Court in A.S.No.675 of 2011 and restore the said Appeal Suit.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner

¶20

:Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent

¶22

:Sri Verna Ramanjaneyulu

¶23

The Court made the following:

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

“In spite of the time having been granted vide order dated 30.07.2025 to file counter-affidavit in I.A.No.1 of 2025, counter-affidavit has not been filed. 2. I.A.No.1 of 2025 is an application to set aside the^orderdated 03.03.2025, by which the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. Having considered the submissions by the learned counsel for the appellant/applicant and also going through^{thecontentsofthe} affidavit, the cause shown is sufficient, I.A. is allowed. 4. The order dated 30.07.2025 is set aside and the Appeal^Suit is restored to its original number”.

¶26

Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER