Bellam Seshaiah v. S.Haneef
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of first appeal for default / non-prosecution; appellant absent, matter listed 'for dismissal'; Section 96 CPC appeal against decree dated 28.10.2009 in A.S.No.228 of 2006 (Additional Senior Civil Judge's Court, Ongole); parties Bellam Seshaiah (appellant) v. S Haneef (respondent); counsel Raveendra Babu Bikki (appellant), V Hari Haran (respondent); Justice T. Mallikarjuna Rao; decided 06.01.2025; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
What did the court decide?
As the appellants were not evincing any interest to prosecute the appeal and there was no representation despite listing under the caption 'for dismissal', the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default, with no order as to costs. ¶21