Dismissed¶¶27

M/s.Leo Granex, a Proprietary Concern, v. Surapaneni Latha

Andhra Pradesh HC20 Aug 2025AS/1032/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Section 96 C.P.C. appeal against Judgment and Decree dated 10.11.2014 in O.S.No.7 of 2007, Principal District Judge, Srikakulam; appellants M/s. Leo Granex (Surapuneni Rani) and Surapuneni Vidyasagar; respondents Surapaneni Latha and Sri Koduru Metals and Minerals; counsel A Radhakrishna for appellants, Vimal Varma Vasi Reddy for respondents; interim orders vacated; miscellaneous petitions closed; no merits adjudication; decided 21.08.2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the appellants to withdraw the appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; interim orders, if any, vacated; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶¶27

M/s.Leo Granex, a Proprietary Concern, Vs Surapaneni Latha — Andhra Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010834682016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS

¶6

APPEAL SUIT NO: 1032 OF 2016

¶7

Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, against the Judgment^andDecree dated 10.11.2014 passed in O.S.No.7 of 2007 on the^file of the Principal District Judge, Srikakulam.

¶8

Between:

¶9

M/s. Leo Granex, a Proprietary Concern, Rep. by its Propretrix Surapuneni Rani, W/o. Vidyasagar, Hindu, Aged about 54 years. Business, R/o.D.No.81-41, 14th main, 15th Cross, JHBC Society, Padmanabhanagar, Bangalore-70, Karnataka State.

¶10

Surapuneni Vidyasagar, S/o. late Doraswamy Naidu,^{Hindu,Agedabout} 57 years. Business, R/o.D.No.81-41, 14th main, 15th^Cross, JHBC Society, Padmanabhanagar, Bangalore-70, Karnataka State.

¶11

...Appellants/Defendants

¶12

AND

¶13

Surapaneni Latha, W/o.Lakshmi Prasad, Hindu, Aged^{about59years.} Business, R/o.Flat Nos.201 & 202, Silverleaf Apartments,^Kirtampudi Layout, Visakhapatnam.

¶14

Sri Koduru Metals and Minerals, a registered Partnership Firm, rep. by its Managing Partner Koduri Satya Venkata Krishna Ravi^Prasad,S/o.

¶15

¶16

Ranga Rao, Hindu, aged about 52 years, D.No.3-746/2, NH-5, wH%ikumpet, Rajahmundry.

¶17

...Respondents/Plaintiffs

¶18

Counsel for the Appellants: Sri A Radhakrishna Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Vimal Varma Vasi Reddy

¶19

The Court made the following Judgment:

¶20

¶21

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS

¶22

APPEAL SUIT No.1032 of 2016

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

Today, when the matter is taken up, Sri A. Radha Krishna, learned counsel for the appellants, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same was endorsed on the

¶25

E.B.

¶26