The Writ Petition challenging the non-consideration of a One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal by IDBI Bank was dismissed as infructuous on the submission that the cause did not survive.
No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 9326 OF 2017
Between:
Kanumuri Kasi Raju, S/o Krishnam Raju, Aged about 37 years, Occ: Agriculturist, Resident of D.No.4-40, I.Bhimavaram, Akividu village and Mandal , West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,orderorDirection more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaringtheaction of the respondent in not acting in the spirit of settlement though the petitioner requested to settle his loan account under the one time settlement (OTS) proposal umpteen times pertaining to the Fish Tank Kissan Credit Card loan sanctioned to the petitioner vide sanction letter bearingaccountNo.FT KCC 094655100000541 Dated 20-11-2009 as illegal, unjust,unconstitutionaland against the procedures of law and against the principles of Natural Justice, while consequently to direct the respondents herein to consider the OTS
proposal keeping in mind of the natural calamitiesoccurred in the year 2014.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 11558 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedingsinpursuanceof bearing loan account No. FT KCC 094655100000541 Dated20-11-2009 until pending disposal of main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. ALMAS BEGUM MOHAMMED
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B HARINATH RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010030522017
[3329]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 9326/2017
Between:
Kanumuri Kasi Raju
...PETITIONER
AND
Idbi Bank and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ALMAS BEGUM MOHAMMED
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.B HARINATH RAO
The Court made the following:
9
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 9326/2017
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearnedcounselfor the respondents.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present WritPetitiondoesnotsurvive and no further adjudication is necessary in the presentWritPetition.Therefore the Writ Petition becomes infructuous.
Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissedasinfructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/-SHAIK MOHD RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
SECTION OFFICER
TF
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.9326 of 2017
o
fx
VO
2 DEC 2C?'f r.jj
. Curreni i»6Ct»on
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Kanumuri Kasi Raju
IDBI Bank
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
