Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear before the Court despite earlier notices and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOUF?ABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 829 OF 2017
Etetween:
...PETITIONERS
AND
i
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No. 4 to 6 in harrasing the petitioners to return a sum of Rs.1,75,00,000 /-, to respondents No.7 & 8, alleged to be received by the 2nd petitioner towards sale consideration from the 7th respondent on execution of sale deed executed by the 2nd petitioner in favour of the Mother-in-law namely Simt.Paida Ammayamma W/o Late Shram Murthy of the 7th respondent, in respect of the land in survey No.203/1 to 3, 203/5, 203/9, 203/11 203/14, 203/15 to 18, 203/22 to 26, 203/28 to 33, 203/35 to 37 and 244/8, • admeasuring Ac.5.50 cents, situated at Santhapuriti village, G.Sigadam Mandel, Srikakulam District and also to declare the action of the 4th and 6th respondents in seizing the licensed Pistol GL No.03/2014SKL (32, NP bore pistol), with license from the 1st petitioner is questioned, as the same is illegal arbitrary, consequently direct the respondent No. 4 to 6 not to interfere with the civil disputes in relation to the afore said land between the 2nd petitioner and 7th respondent and direct the 4th respondent to return
the licensed Pistol GL No.03/2014SKL (32 NP bore pistol), with original license
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 916 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to harass the petitioners for return of the amount of Rs.1,75,00,000/- alleged to have been received by the 2nd petitioner towards sale consideration from the7th .respondent persuant to execution of sale deed in respect of land in Survey No. 203/1 to 3, 203/5, 203/9, 203/11, 203/14, 203/15 to 18, 203/22 to 26, 203/28 to 33, 203/35 to 37 and 244/8,admeasuring A .5.50 cents, situatedatSanthapuriti village, G.Sigadam Mandal, Srikakulam District by returning the licensed Pistol GL NO.03/2014SKL (32 NP bore pistol), with original license pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counscil for the Petitioner : SRI A PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent! to 6 : GP FOF? HOME
Couns€!l for the Respondents: KOLLIJ RAJASEKHAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010082702017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3310] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 829/2017
Between:
Pedada Srirama Murthy and another ...PETITIONER(S) AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.A PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.5187/KOLLU RAJASEKHAR
' 2.GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following order:
When the matter is taken up for consideration today, there is no representation for the petitioners and on earlier occasion also there was no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting their case.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissedfor non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending.
shaii stands closed.
/
SDI- LT SRIDEVl ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
-»
- *A/o CCs to GP FOR HOME .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] • “
KM
!
HIGH COURT [)ATE:D:07/05/2024
ORDER
WP.NiO.829 of 2017
Of
8"
I 2 0 JAN 2025 ^
^ . Current iieciion
DISMISING THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
Pedada Srirama Murthy
Pedada Ram Mohan Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Visakhapatnam Region
The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
