High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of a provisional attachment notice as withdrawn by the petitioner, noting nothing survived due to a prior order. No substantive reasons included.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
■ .
/ II
IN THIE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBEf^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^ ’
O'
>,
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANCAN RAO AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATI<.N
y
WRIT PETITION NO: 7961 OF 2023 X
Bet>A/een:
M/S. SKS Traders, Rep. by its Proprietor Mr Shaik Shabeer Ahamed 17-730, Shop No.5, Mothi Nagar, NVR Nagar Street Madanpalle Town, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the notice of provisional attachment dated 3.11.2022 in DRC 22 issued by the 1st Respondent to the Petitioner's banker as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law. without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice, and consecidently direct the direct the 1 Respondent and 2nd Respondent to revoke the notice dated 3.11.2022.
lA NO: 1 OF 20?.-^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of notice of provisional attachment in DRC 22 issued by the 1st Respondent, pending disposal of the writ Petition, in the interest of justice as otherwise the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and hardship.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. SRINIVASA RA^ KUDUPUDI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2 & 4: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU SC FOR CBIC
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI PASALA p6nNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
The Court made the following: ORDER
r
1
RRR,J & HN,J W.P.No.7961/2023
i-
APHC010155452023
m
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3488]
WEDNESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 7961/2023
Between:
M/s. Sks Traders
...PETITIONER
AND
The Assistant Commissioner St and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SRINIVASA RAO KUDUPUDI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following ORDER:
(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitionerthatinviewof the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.26244 of 2023, nothing further survives in this writ petition.
Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
RRR,J & HN,J W.P.No.7961/2023
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/P VENKATA RAMANA //TRUE COPY// ■ JOINT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To
AL
Pi
high court
DATED: 18/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.7961 of 2023
g 2 OCT ao/"! I
^ . Current Section
DISMtISSING the wp as withdrawnWITHOUT
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.26244 of 2023Referred¶55
M/s. Sks Traders
The Assistant Commissioner ST
The Chief Commissioner of State Taxes
The Assistant Commissioner (Central Tax)
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Union of India
R. Raghunandan Rao
H. Harinath N.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
