D.Dilshad Wuraf Sultanbi, Kurnool Dist v. Prl Secy, Mines and Geology Dept, Hyd and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed the writ petition considered not to survive without ordering costs.
High Court closed the writ petition considered not to survive without ordering costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR v
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7769 OF 2014
Between:
R/o.Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Mandal & District. ...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, to declare the action of the 3'^'^ respondent in including the Petitioner's patta land in Sy.No.55 admeasuring Ac.4.69 cents, Sy.No.55 admeasuring Ac.3.00 cents, Sy.No.96/2 admeasuring Ac.1.45 cents total extent of Ac.9.14 cents, situated at Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Mandal and District, in the list of the lands allotted to the 4'^ Respondent company, without any authority
A
and without following the due procedure contemplatedundertheLawas being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondentauthoritiesto delete the above said lands from the list of the lands allotted to the 4*^ Respondent company, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstancesofthecase.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 9656 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including dispossession of the Petitioner from the lands in Sy.No.55 admeasuring Ac.4.69 cents, Sy.No.55 admeasuring Ac. 3.00 cents, Sy.No.96/2 admeasuringAC.1.45 cents total extent of Ac.9.l4 cents, situated at Gargeyapuram Village, Kurnool Mandal and District, pursuant to the List prepared by the 3 rd Respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. VARUN BYREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI. MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED The Court made the following: ORDER.
\ s
APHC010026892014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7769/2014
Between:
D.dilshad Wuraf Sultanbi, Kurnool Dist ...PETITIONER
AND
Prl Secy Mines Geology Dept Hyd 3 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VARUN BYREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED
2.GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.M.V.Archita,learned counsel representing Mr.Varun Byreddy, learned counselforthepetitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petitiondoesnotsurvive, and hence, it may be closed.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isclosed.Thereshall be no order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/- M.PRABHAKAR>VR>AO //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFl'C
To
- One CC to Sri. Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, Advocate [OPUC]
- Three CD Copies.
VJ
HIGH COURT DATED:19/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.7769 of 2014
CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
D.Dilshad Wuraf Sultanbi
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
K MADHAVA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court